Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRVL vs AMSF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRVL
CorVel Corporation

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.98B
5Y Perf.+156.6%
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$569M
5Y Perf.-50.6%

CRVL vs AMSF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRVL logoCRVL
AMSF logoAMSF
IndustryInsurance - BrokersInsurance - Specialty
Market Cap$2.98B$569M
Revenue (TTM)$941M$325M
Net Income (TTM)$106M$46M
Gross Margin24.2%47.6%
Operating Margin14.5%17.8%
Forward P/E33.4x14.4x
Total Debt$28M$491K
Cash & Equiv.$171M$62M

CRVL vs AMSFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRVL
AMSF
StockMay 20May 26Return
CorVel Corporation (CRVL)100256.6+156.6%
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)10049.4-50.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRVL vs AMSF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSF leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CorVel Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CRVL
CorVel Corporation
The Insurance Pick

CRVL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48
  • Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.5%
  • 267.5% 10Y total return vs AMSF's 31.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

AMSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Beta 0.23, yield 8.4%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 33.4x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCRVL logoCRVL12.6% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
ValueAMSF logoAMSFLower P/E (14.4x vs 33.4x)
Quality / MarginsAMSF logoAMSFCombined ratio 0.8 vs CRVL's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyAMSF logoAMSFBeta 0.23 vs CRVL's 0.48, lower leverage
DividendsAMSF logoAMSF8.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMSF logoAMSF-29.2% vs CRVL's -47.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CRVL logoCRVL16.4% ROA vs AMSF's 5.6%, ROIC 51.3% vs 21.9%

CRVL vs AMSF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRVLCorVel Corporation
FY 2025
Patient Management Services
64.9%$581M
Network Solutions Services
35.1%$314M
AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRVL vs AMSF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCRVLLAGGINGAMSF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRVL is the larger business by revenue, generating $941M annually — 2.9x AMSF's $325M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.3% (AMSF) to 11.2% (CRVL). On growth, AMSF holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRVL logoCRVLCorVel CorporationAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$941M$325M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$168M$58M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$106M$46M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$69M$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.2%+47.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.5%+17.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%+14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.3%+2.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.4%+10.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%-8.5%
AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.3x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 61% valuation discount to CRVL's 31.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMSF's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRVL's 18.9x.

MetricCRVL logoCRVLCorVel CorporationAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.0B$569M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.8B$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS31.73x12.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.33.37x14.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.88x8.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.33x1.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.38x2.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.57x63.83x
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CRVL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

CRVL delivers a 28.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMSF. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRVL's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRVL scores 8/9 vs AMSF's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRVL logoCRVLCorVel CorporationAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+28.1%+9.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.4%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+51.3%+21.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+39.5%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$143M-$61M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$171M$62M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28M$491,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense
CRVL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CRVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CRVL five years ago would be worth $14,573 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,110 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, AMSF leads with a -29.2% total return vs CRVL's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRVL at -5.9% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRVL logoCRVLCorVel CorporationAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.7%-18.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-47.9%-29.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.7%-24.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.7%-18.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+267.5%+31.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.9%-9.1%
CRVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMSF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRVL's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMSF currently trades 62.4% from its 52-week high vs CRVL's 49.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRVL logoCRVLCorVel CorporationAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.48x0.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$117.22$48.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$44.83$29.42
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+49.5%+62.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.534.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded203K212K
AMSF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CRVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

AMSF is the only dividend payer here at 8.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCRVL logoCRVLCorVel CorporationAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts6
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.3%+2.1%
CRVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AMSF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CRVL leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).

Best OverallCorVel Corporation (CRVL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRVL vs AMSF: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRVL or AMSF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CorVel Corporation (CRVL) is the stronger pick with 12.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRVL or AMSF?

On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus CorVel Corporation at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRVL or AMSF?

Over the past 5 years, CorVel Corporation (CRVL) delivered a total return of +45.

7%, compared to -18. 9% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRVL returned +267. 5% versus AMSF's +31. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRVL or AMSF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus CorVel Corporation's 0. 48β — meaning CRVL is approximately 107% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for CorVel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRVL or AMSF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CorVel Corporation (CRVL) is pulling ahead at 12.

6% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CorVel Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRVL leads at 11. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRVL or AMSF?

AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus 10. 6% for CorVel Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus 13. 5% for CRVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRVL or AMSF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 4x for CorVel Corporation — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRVL or AMSF?

In this comparison, AMSF (8.

4% yield) pays a dividend. CRVL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CRVL or AMSF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +31. 8%, CRVL: +267. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRVL and AMSF?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock. AMSF pays a dividend while CRVL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CRVL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRVL and AMSF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRVL: 3.4% · AMSF: 10.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(CRVL: 11.2% · AMSF: 14.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CRVL: 31.7x · AMSF: 12.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.