Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRWS vs CULP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
CRWS vs CULP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $30M | $46M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $201M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.7% | 1.0% |
| Total Debt | $32M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $521K | $6M |
CRWS vs CULP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
| Culp, Inc. (CULP) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRWS vs CULP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRWS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.4%, EPS growth -287.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
- -22.3% 10Y total return vs CULP's -76.0%
- -0.4% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4%
CULP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.71
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 1.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.4% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.6% margin vs CRWS's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs CRWS's 0.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.7% vs CULP's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.9% ROA vs CRWS's -12.7%, ROIC -9.6% vs 4.5% |
CRWS vs CULP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRWS vs CULP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRWS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CULP is the larger business by revenue, generating $201M annually — 2.3x CRWS's $86M. CULP is the more profitable business, keeping -3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRWS's -11.5%. On growth, CRWS holds the edge at -3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $201M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +13.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | +1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | -8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.4% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CRWS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $46M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $61M | $58M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.08x | -2.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.78x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.04x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CULP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CULP delivers a -13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-26 for CRWS. CULP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRWS's 0.80x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.7% | -13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | -10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $521,000 | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | -39.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRWS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRWS five years ago would be worth $6,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,738 for CULP. Over the past 12 months, CRWS leads with a +2.7% total return vs CULP's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWS at -10.7% vs CULP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.8% | -30.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | -72.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.3% | -76.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CULP is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRWS's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRWS currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs CULP's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.38 | $4.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.35 | $2.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 66.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 29K |
Analyst Outlook
CULP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CRWS is the only dividend payer here at 11.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
CRWS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CULP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CRWS vs CULP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRWS or CULP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is the stronger pick with -0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRWS or CULP?
Over the past 5 years, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) delivered a total return of -39. 8%, compared to -72. 6% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWS returned -22. 3% versus CULP's -76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRWS or CULP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Culp, Inc.
(CULP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Crown Crafts, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning CRWS is approximately 3% more volatile than CULP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Culp, Inc. (CULP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 80% for Crown Crafts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRWS or CULP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is pulling ahead at -0. 4% versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Culp, Inc. grew EPS -37. 8% year-over-year, compared to -287. 5% for Crown Crafts, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRWS leads at -0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRWS or CULP?
Culp, Inc.
(CULP) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Crown Crafts, Inc. — meaning it keeps -9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRWS leads at 5. 0% versus -4. 2% for CULP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRWS leads at 23. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CRWS or CULP?
In this comparison, CRWS (11.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CULP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CRWS or CULP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 11. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRWS: -22. 3%, CULP: -76. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CRWS and CULP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRWS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CRWS pays a dividend while CULP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.