Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Apparel - Manufacturers
CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Apparel - Manufacturers | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $30M | $46M | $69M | $106M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $201M | $1M | $193M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-7M | $-132K | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 13.0% | 59.0% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -13.7% | 1.0% | -3.3% | -7.2% |
| Total Debt | $32M | $18M | $354M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $521K | $6M | $2M | $17M |
CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
| Culp, Inc. (CULP) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRWS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 11.4%
- Beta 0.74, yield 11.4%, current ratio 3.57x
- 11.4% yield, vs LAKE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +2.7% vs SNBR's -56.8%
CULP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- -3.6% margin vs LAKE's -19.4%
- Beta 0.71 vs SNBR's 2.70
SNBR is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -0.0% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC -0.0% vs -5.1%
LAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth -437.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- 34.0% 10Y total return vs CRWS's -22.3%
- 34.1% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.6% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SNBR's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs LAKE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.7% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC -0.0% vs -5.1% |
CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRWS leads 0 • CULP leads 0 • SNBR leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CULP is the larger business by revenue, generating $201M annually — 142.1x SNBR's $1M. CULP is the more profitable business, keeping -3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, LAKE holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $201M | $1M | $193M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $3M | $72M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$7M | -$132,000 | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$11M | -$21M | -$16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +13.0% | +59.0% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | +1.0% | -3.3% | -7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -3.6% | -9.4% | -19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -5.7% | -14.6% | -8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | -8.2% | -3.8% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.4% | +18.2% | -11.2% | -165.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $46M | $69M | $106M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $61M | $58M | $422M | $120M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.08x | -2.35x | -0.53x | -4.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.78x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.21x | 49.07x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 0.78x | — | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.04x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CULP delivers a -13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-28 for LAKE. LAKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRWS's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRWS scores 3/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.7% | -13.3% | — | -27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | -5.9% | -0.0% | -17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -9.6% | -0.0% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | -10.6% | — | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.31x | — | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $12M | $353M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $521,000 | $6M | $2M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $18M | $354M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | -39.03x | -780.16x | -23.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRWS five years ago would be worth $6,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $271 for SNBR. Over the past 12 months, CRWS leads with a +2.7% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAKE at -1.3% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +2.6% | -64.7% | +22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -9.1% | -56.8% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.8% | -30.4% | -87.2% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | -72.6% | -97.3% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.3% | -76.0% | -87.6% | +34.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | -11.4% | -49.6% | -1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CULP is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRWS currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.71x | 2.70x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.38 | $4.80 | $13.94 | $20.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.35 | $2.93 | $1.07 | $7.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +75.0% | +21.7% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 66.8 | 53.4 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 29K | 2.8M | 100K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNBR as "Hold", LAKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs 29.2% for LAKE (target: $14). For income investors, CRWS offers the higher dividend yield at 11.41% vs LAKE's 1.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.00 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 11 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.8% | +0.4% |
LAKE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
CRWS vs CULP vs SNBR vs LAKE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE?
Over the past 5 years, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) delivered a total return of -39. 8%, compared to -97. 3% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAKE returned +34. 0% versus SNBR's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Culp, Inc.
(CULP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 278% more volatile than CULP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 80% for Crown Crafts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Culp, Inc. grew EPS -37. 8% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAKE leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE?
Culp, Inc.
(CULP) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 0% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps -9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRWS leads at 5. 0% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE?
In this comparison, CRWS (11.
4% yield), LAKE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CULP, SNBR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CRWS or CULP or SNBR or LAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 11. 4% yield). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRWS: -22. 3%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CRWS and CULP and SNBR and LAKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRWS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock. CRWS, LAKE pay a dividend while CULP, SNBR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.