CRWV vs GPUS

For growth investors, CoreWeave, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (CRWV) is the stronger pick with 167. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Analysts rate CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CRWV) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, CoreWeave, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (CRWV) delivered a total return of +244. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWV returned +244. 9% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.

(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 3. 08β — meaning CRWV is approximately 32% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CRWV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoreWeave, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (CRWV) is pulling ahead at 167. 9% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hyperscale Data, Inc. grew EPS 76. 2% year-over-year, compared to -20. 6% for CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CoreWeave, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (CRWV) is the more profitable company, earning -22. 7% net margin versus -52. 7% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — meaning it keeps -22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRWV leads at -0. 9% versus -53. 4% for GPUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRWV leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, GPUS (100.

0% yield) pays a dividend. CRWV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hyperscale Data, Inc.

(GPUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (100. 0% yield). CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CRWV) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPUS: -100. 0%, CRWV: +244. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CRWV (Technology) and GPUS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CRWV is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GPUS pays a dividend while CRWV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.