Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CSGP vs MKTW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
CSGP vs MKTW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $14.79B | $42M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.41B | $326M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $64M |
| Gross Margin | 77.4% | 86.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | 19.2% |
| Forward P/E | 25.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.14B | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $70M |
CSGP vs MKTW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 41.1 | -58.9% |
| MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSGP vs MKTW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSGP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 80.5% 10Y total return vs MKTW's -87.8%
- 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs MKTW's -20.3%
MKTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 11.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 0.56x
- Beta 0.37, yield 11.3%, current ratio 0.56x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs MKTW's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs CSGP's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs CSGP's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 11.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.4% vs CSGP's -54.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.4% ROA vs CSGP's 0.2% |
CSGP vs MKTW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CSGP vs MKTW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 10.5x MKTW's $326M. MKTW is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSGP's 0.7%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $326M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $278M | $65M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.4% | +86.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.5% | -16.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.7% | +98.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MKTW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, MKTW trades at a 100% valuation discount to CSGP's 2102.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $42M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.2B | -$22M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2102.41x | 7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.78x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 83.54x | -0.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.56x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 360.77x | 0.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CSGP and MKTW each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSGP scores 5/9 vs MKTW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +29.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$589M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.58x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGP five years ago would be worth $4,185 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,217 for MKTW. Over the past 12 months, MKTW leads with a +42.4% total return vs CSGP's -54.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKTW at -10.1% vs CSGP's -22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.9% | +18.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.7% | +42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.2% | -27.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -87.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.5% | -87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.4% | -10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MKTW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSGP's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKTW currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.43 | $21.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.31 | $13.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.8% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.6 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 25K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CSGP as "Buy" and MKTW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 77.4% upside for CSGP (target: $62) vs -79.9% for MKTW (target: $4). MKTW is the only dividend payer here at 11.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.91 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | 0.0% |
MKTW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
CSGP vs MKTW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSGP or MKTW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSGP or MKTW?
On trailing P/E, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2102. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSGP or MKTW?
Over the past 5 years, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) delivered a total return of -58. 2%, compared to -87. 8% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGP returned +80. 5% versus MKTW's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSGP or MKTW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus CoStar Group, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning CSGP is approximately 115% more volatile than MKTW relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CSGP or MKTW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -20. 3% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MarketWise, Inc. grew EPS -35. 3% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSGP or MKTW?
MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus 0. 2% for CoStar Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTW leads at 19. 2% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTW leads at 86. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSGP or MKTW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 77.
4% to $61. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSGP or MKTW?
In this comparison, MKTW (11.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CSGP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CSGP or MKTW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 11. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTW: -87. 8%, CSGP: +80. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSGP and MKTW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CSGP (Real Estate) and MKTW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MKTW is a small-cap deep-value stock. MKTW pays a dividend while CSGP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.