Media & Entertainment
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CTCT vs INTU vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Banks - Diversified
CTCT vs INTU vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Software - Application | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $75.70B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $20.93B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $4.58B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 81.0% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 27.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 72.8x | 11.6x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $6.64B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $2.88B | $343.34B |
CTCT vs INTU vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intuit Inc. (INTU) | 100 | 93.4 | -6.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTCT vs INTU vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 91.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 16.2% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
INTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- PEG 0.80 vs JPM's 0.81
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs INTU's 187.3%
- 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs INTU's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +21.8% vs INTU's -63.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 72.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.9% margin vs CTCT's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs INTU's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs INTU's -63.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 16.5% vs 4.5% |
CTCT vs INTU vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTCT vs INTU vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 774.7x CTCT's $362M. INTU is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTCT's 5.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $20.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $6.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $4.6B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $7.7B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +81.0% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +27.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +21.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +36.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +10.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +10.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 78% valuation discount to CTCT's 72.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs INTU's 1.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $75.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $79.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.75x | 20.24x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.61x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.39x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 13.86x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 4.02x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 3.97x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | 12.44x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INTU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INTU delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $7 for CTCT. CTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTU scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +23.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +16.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +19.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.34x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | $3.8B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $2.9B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $6.6B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 16.95x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,175 for INTU. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs INTU's -63.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs INTU's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -55.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -63.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -35.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -38.3% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +187.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -13.5% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INTU and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs INTU's 34.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.44x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $813.70 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $268.01 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +34.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 32.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 4.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INTU as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.8% upside for INTU (target: $459) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs INTU's 1.52%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $458.82 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.20 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +3.7% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). INTU leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CTCT vs INTU vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTCT or INTU or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuit Inc. (INTU) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTCT or INTU or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Constant Contact, Inc. at 72. 8x. On forward P/E, Intuit Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intuit Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTCT or INTU or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -38. 3% for Intuit Inc. (INTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus INTU's +187. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTCT or INTU or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 112% more volatile than INTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTCT or INTU or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Constant Contact, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTCT leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTCT or INTU or JPM?
Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 4. 3% for Constant Contact, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INTU leads at 26. 1% versus 6. 0% for CTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INTU leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTCT or INTU or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Intuit Inc. (INTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Intuit Inc. (INTU) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTU: 65. 8% to $458. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTCT or INTU or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), INTU (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CTCT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTCT or INTU or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), 1. 5% yield, +187. 3% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTCT and INTU and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CTCT (Technology) and INTU (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; INTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. INTU, JPM pay a dividend while CTCT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.