Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $304K | $223M | $3.55B | $2.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $443M | $0.00 | $3.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-12M | $0.00 | $-504M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 56.5% | — | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | -76.1% | -2.4% | — | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.3x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $38M | $0.00 | $3.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $79M | — | $166M |
CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles & Colvard, … (CTHR) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Brilliant Earth Gro… (BRLT) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| Signet Jewelers Lim… (SIG) | 100 | 121.8 | +21.8% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 42.4 | -57.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTHR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BRLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth -8.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 47.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.20, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- 3.6% revenue growth vs SIG's -100.0%
SIG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.74
- -8.9% 10Y total return vs CPRI's -63.1%
- Better valuation composite
- +42.9% vs CTHR's -18.8%
CPRI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs SIG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.6% margin vs CTHR's -76.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs CTHR's 2.27 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs CTHR's -18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.5% ROA vs CTHR's -41.1%, ROIC -9.7% vs -37.7% |
CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRI leads in 1 of 6 categories
CTHR leads 1 • BRLT leads 1 • SIG leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI and SIG operate at a comparable scale, with $3.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. BRLT is the more profitable business, keeping -2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTHR's -76.0%. On growth, BRLT holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $443M | $0 | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$6M | $0 | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$12M | $0 | -$504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$6M | -$2M | $491M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +56.5% | — | +61.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -76.1% | -2.4% | — | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -76.0% | -2.6% | — | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.6% | -1.3% | — | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.0% | +6.0% | -2.9% | -18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.5% | -2.3% | -146.7% | +120.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $304,032 | $223M | $3.6B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $573,029 | $182M | $3.6B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | -5.64x | — | -1.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.29x | 13.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 120.80x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.51x | — | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.61x | — | 5.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 38.76x | — | 14.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRLT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRLT delivers a -14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. CTHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTHR scores 4/9 vs SIG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -62.7% | -14.0% | — | -4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.1% | -5.5% | — | -15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.7% | -9.7% | — | -13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.5% | -3.4% | — | -17.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.48x | — | 8.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $268,997 | -$41M | $0 | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $79M | — | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $38M | $0 | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -85.54x | 51.57x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIG five years ago would be worth $14,312 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for CTHR. Over the past 12 months, SIG leads with a +42.9% total return vs CTHR's -18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIG at 9.1% vs CTHR's -78.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.4% | -21.2% | +3.0% | -23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.8% | +6.4% | +42.9% | +18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -58.2% | +30.0% | -50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -90.3% | +43.1% | -68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -90.3% | -8.9% | -63.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.3% | -25.2% | +9.1% | -20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRLT and SIG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLT is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTHR's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIG currently trades 79.8% from its 52-week high vs CTHR's 9.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.27x | 1.20x | 1.74x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.00 | $3.10 | $110.20 | $28.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $1.21 | $61.50 | $15.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.8% | +45.5% | +79.8% | +66.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.8 | 51.2 | 48.7 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449 | 56K | 919K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CTHR and SIG each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIG as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.5% upside for CPRI (target: $25) vs 25.0% for SIG (target: $110). BRLT is the only dividend payer here at 1.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $110.00 | $25.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 30 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
CPRI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CTHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CTHR vs BRLT vs SIG vs CPRI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). Analysts rate Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI?
Over the past 5 years, Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) delivered a total return of +43.
1%, compared to -99. 7% for Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (CTHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIG returned -8. 9% versus CTHR's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Charles & Colvard, Ltd. 's 2. 27β — meaning CTHR is approximately 89% more volatile than BRLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (CTHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Signet Jewelers Limited grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -888. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRLT leads at -0. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI?
Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -65. 4% for Charles & Colvard, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIG leads at 0. 0% versus -66. 5% for CTHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Capri Holdings Limited — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 35. 5% to $25. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI?
In this comparison, BRLT (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CTHR, SIG, CPRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CTHR or BRLT or SIG or CPRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 8% yield). Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (CTHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRLT: -90. 3%, CTHR: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CTHR and BRLT and SIG and CPRI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BRLT pays a dividend while CTHR, SIG, CPRI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.