CTM
Castellum, Inc.
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$51M
5Y Perf.-21.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CTM vs SAIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.-13.3%
CTM vs SAIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CTM | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $51M | $4.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $7.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $358M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 24.9x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $217M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $182M |
CTM vs SAIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CTM
SAIC
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Castellum, Inc. (CTM) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| Science Application… (SAIC) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTM vs SAIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SAIC leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Castellum, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
The Growth Play
CTM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 114.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.22, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 4.40x
- 18.1% revenue growth vs SAIC's -2.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
The Income Pick
SAIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 1.6%
- 104.4% 10Y total return vs CTM's -45.3%
- Beta 0.26, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.20x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CTM | 18.1% revenue growth vs SAIC's -2.9% |
| Value | SAIC | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 24.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | SAIC | 4.9% margin vs CTM's 4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | SAIC | Beta 0.26 vs CTM's 2.22 |
| Dividends | SAIC | 1.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CTM's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SAIC | -20.9% vs CTM's -26.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SAIC | 6.8% ROA vs CTM's 5.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs -10.1% |
CTM vs SAIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CTM vs SAIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSAICLAGGINGCTM
CTMCastellum, Inc.
0leads
SAICScience Applications …
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CTMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SAIC2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SAIC5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SAIC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SAIC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SAIC2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CTM and SAIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.3B annually — 137.4x CTM's $53M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.9% (SAIC) to 4.7% (CTM). On growth, CTM holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTMCastellum, Inc. | SAICScience Applicati… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $666M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $358M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $609M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +12.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.9% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +177.2% | -6.5% |
Evenly matched — CTM and SAIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SAIC trades at a 51% valuation discount to CTM's 24.9x P/E.
| Metric | CTMCastellum, Inc. | SAICScience Applicati… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $51M | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.87x | 12.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.96x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 2.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.34x |
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAIC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAIC delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $8 for CTM. CTM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAIC's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAIC scores 7/9 vs CTM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CTMCastellum, Inc. | SAICScience Applicati… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.1% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | $35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $217M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.66x | 3.99x |
SAIC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAIC five years ago would be worth $11,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,472 for CTM. Over the past 12 months, SAIC leads with a -20.9% total return vs CTM's -26.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAIC at -0.3% vs CTM's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CTMCastellum, Inc. | SAICScience Applicati… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.8% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.2% | -20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.6% | -0.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +12.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +104.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | -0.3% |
SAIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTM's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIC currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs CTM's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTMCastellum, Inc. | SAICScience Applicati… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.56 | $124.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $81.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.1% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 946K | 563K |
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SAIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs CTM's 0.17%.
| Metric | CTMCastellum, Inc. | SAICScience Applicati… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $97.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.5% |
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SAIC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallScience Applications Intern… (SAIC)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CTM vs SAIC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTM or SAIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Castellum, Inc.
(CTM) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTM or SAIC?
On trailing P/E, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Castellum, Inc. at 24. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTM or SAIC?
Over the past 5 years, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) delivered a total return of +12.
4%, compared to -45. 3% for Castellum, Inc. (CTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIC returned +104. 0% versus CTM's -37. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTM or SAIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Castellum, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning CTM is approximately 732% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Castellum, Inc. (CTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 14% for Science Applications International Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTM or SAIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Castellum, Inc.
(CTM) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Castellum, Inc. grew EPS 114. 7% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for Science Applications International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTM leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTM or SAIC?
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
9% net margin versus 4. 7% for Castellum, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAIC leads at 7. 1% versus -5. 3% for CTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTM leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CTM or SAIC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 2% for Castellum, Inc. (CTM).
08Is CTM or SAIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 1. 6% yield, +104. 0% 10Y return). Castellum, Inc. (CTM) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIC: +104. 0%, CTM: -37. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CTM and SAIC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAIC is a small-cap deep-value stock. SAIC pays a dividend while CTM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CTM: 21.9% · SAIC: -4.8%)Net Margin>
%
(CTM: 4.7% · SAIC: 4.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CTM: 24.9x · SAIC: 12.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.