Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTMX vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CTMX vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $681M | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-59M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | 69.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -181.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $714M |
CTMX vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CytomX Therapeutics… (CTMX) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTMX vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTMX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for dividends and momentum.
- 0.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +316.4% vs IMVT's +96.1%
- -28.0% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.37
- EPS growth -45.2%
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs CTMX's -66.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -21.3% revenue growth vs CTMX's -44.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs CTMX's -166.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.37 vs CTMX's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +316.4% vs IMVT's +96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -28.0% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
CTMX vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTMX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $36M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$59M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$80M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -181.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -166.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.0% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CTMX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $681M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $673M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.67x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.94x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.57x | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CTMX and IMVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTMX delivers a -36.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-37 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTMX's 0.04x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.0% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CTMX and IMVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,678 for CTMX. Over the past 12 months, CTMX leads with a +316.4% total return vs IMVT's +96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTMX at 33.5% vs IMVT's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +316.4% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.1% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.2% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.9% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
IMVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTMX's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CTMX's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.91 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTMX as "Buy" and IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 190.0% upside for CTMX (target: $12) vs 67.2% for IMVT (target: $46). CTMX is the only dividend payer here at 0.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.60 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). CTMX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CTMX vs IMVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTMX or IMVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.
(CTMX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTMX or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -53. 2% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus CTMX's -66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTMX or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning CTMX is approximately 8% more volatile than IMVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTMX or IMVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immunovant, Inc.
grew EPS -45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -139. 5% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTMX or IMVT?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -22. 8% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -25. 7% for CTMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTMX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTMX or IMVT?
In this comparison, CTMX (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. IMVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CTMX or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.
(CTMX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTMX: -66. 9%, IMVT: +173. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTMX and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CTMX pays a dividend while IMVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.