Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $78M | $3.09B | $2.07B | $730M | $342M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $68M | $1.04B | $1.31B | $275M | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $84M | $262M | $46M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 33.0% | 56.7% | 36.9% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | -62.2% | 13.6% | 28.2% | 26.0% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 2.3x | 8.0x | 4.8x | 12.6x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $1.07B | $1.42B | $537M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $500M | $270M | $84M | $63M |
CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 526.7 | +426.7% |
| Navios Maritime Par… (NMM) | 100 | 1069.8 | +969.8% |
| Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) | 100 | 679.9 | +579.9% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTRM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (2.3x vs 6.9x)
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 19.9% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
- Beta 0.72 vs CTRM's 1.22
- 4.4% ROA vs CTRM's -6.3%, ROIC 8.3% vs 0.2%
SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
- Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
- 8.2% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1%
SHIP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +207.0% vs CTRM's -4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 6.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs CTRM's -65.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs CTRM's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.0% vs CTRM's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs CTRM's -6.3%, ROIC 8.3% vs 0.2% |
CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTRM leads 1 • SHIP leads 1 • SB leads 1 • SBLK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 19.3x CTRM's $68M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRM's -65.4%. On growth, SHIP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $68M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $275M | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $311M | $693M | $131M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $84M | $262M | $46M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58M | $209M | $30M | $55M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +33.0% | +56.7% | +36.9% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -62.2% | +13.6% | +28.2% | +26.0% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -65.4% | +8.1% | +19.9% | +16.8% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.1% | +20.0% | +2.3% | +19.9% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.2% | -2.7% | +1.8% | -3.7% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -94.1% | +58.3% | -40.6% | -31.8% | +84.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CTRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.3x trailing earnings, CTRM trades at a 94% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78M | $3.1B | $2.1B | $730M | $342M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102M | $3.7B | $3.2B | $1.2B | $570M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.32x | 36.73x | 5.97x | 8.36x | 16.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.00x | 4.81x | 12.61x | 6.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.86x | 11.87x | 4.85x | 6.96x | 7.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 2.97x | 1.55x | 2.37x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | 1.26x | 0.69x | 0.90x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.73x | — | — | 20.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CTRM. CTRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMM scores 7/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.0% | +3.4% | +8.1% | +5.6% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | +2.2% | +4.4% | +3.4% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +3.2% | +8.3% | +6.6% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +4.0% | +9.0% | +8.6% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.44x | 0.46x | 0.65x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $572M | $1.2B | $453M | $228M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $500M | $270M | $84M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $537M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.80x | 2.08x | 2.78x | 2.34x | 1.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,157 for CTRM. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs CTRM's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs CTRM's -32.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | +40.3% | +39.4% | +44.6% | +79.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.7% | +83.1% | +99.4% | +110.5% | +207.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.4% | +60.6% | +216.8% | +105.9% | +282.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +79.1% | +120.5% | +94.6% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +977.3% | +267.2% | +765.0% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.6% | +17.1% | +46.9% | +27.2% | +56.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTRM's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CTRM's 76.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.73x | 0.72x | 0.98x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.65 | $27.20 | $77.90 | $7.20 | $16.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.66 | $14.79 | $35.05 | $3.33 | $5.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +98.6% | +91.9% | +96.3% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 72.8 | 57.2 | 61.0 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 1.4M | 166K | 576K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", NMM as "Hold", SB as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs NMM's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 | $85.00 | $4.20 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 14 | 22 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +4.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $0.30 | $0.20 | $0.27 | $0.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +1.2% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CTRM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CTRM vs SBLK vs NMM vs SB vs SHIP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) offers the better valuation at 2. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP?
On trailing P/E, Castor Maritime Inc.
(CTRM) is the cheapest at 2. 3x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP?
Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to -88. 4% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Castor Maritime Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning CTRM is approximately 68% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP?
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus 8. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 3% for CTRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Safe Bulkers, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).
09Is CTRM or SBLK or NMM or SB or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, CTRM: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTRM and SBLK and NMM and SB and SHIP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTRM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. CTRM, SBLK, SB, SHIP pay a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.