Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTRN vs PLCE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
CTRN vs PLCE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $397M | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $801M | $1.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $-52M |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 43.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $220M | $586M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $5M |
CTRN vs PLCE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) | 100 | 286.0 | +186.0% |
| The Children's Plac… (PLCE) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRN vs PLCE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.67
- Rev growth 0.7%, EPS growth -255.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.8%
- 177.6% 10Y total return vs PLCE's -86.4%
In this particular matchup, PLCE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.0% margin vs PLCE's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs PLCE's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.4% vs PLCE's -42.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.6% ROA vs PLCE's -6.7%, ROIC -10.1% vs 2.6% |
CTRN vs PLCE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTRN vs PLCE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLCE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 1.6x CTRN's $801M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.0% (CTRN) to -4.0% (PLCE). On growth, CTRN holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $801M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | -$52M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +28.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | -13.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -112.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CTRN and PLCE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $397M | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $556M | $655M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.95x | -0.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 43.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLCE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLCE scores 3/9 vs CTRN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.1% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $159M | $581M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $586M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.65x | -0.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTRN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTRN five years ago would be worth $4,332 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $420 for PLCE. Over the past 12 months, CTRN leads with a +102.4% total return vs PLCE's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRN at 43.4% vs PLCE's -50.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | -19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +102.4% | -42.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.9% | -87.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.6% | -86.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.4% | -50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CTRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLCE's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRN currently trades 82.2% from its 52-week high vs PLCE's 34.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.51 | $9.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.35 | $2.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +34.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 359K |
Analyst Outlook
PLCE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.9% |
CTRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PLCE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CTRN vs PLCE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRN or PLCE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) is the stronger pick with 0. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Analysts rate Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTRN or PLCE?
Over the past 5 years, Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) delivered a total return of -56. 7%, compared to -95. 8% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRN returned +177. 6% versus PLCE's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTRN or PLCE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus The Children's Place, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning PLCE is approximately 36% more volatile than CTRN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CTRN or PLCE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) is pulling ahead at 0. 7% versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Children's Place, Inc. grew EPS 63. 3% year-over-year, compared to -255. 5% for Citi Trends, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTRN leads at -8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTRN or PLCE?
The Children's Place, Inc.
(PLCE) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 2% net margin versus -5. 7% for Citi Trends, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLCE leads at 1. 2% versus -5. 2% for CTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTRN or PLCE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CTRN or PLCE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+177. 6% 10Y return). The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRN: +177. 6%, PLCE: -86. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTRN and PLCE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.