Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Apparel - Retail
CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $403M | $74M | $35M | $274M | $53M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $801M | $1.29B | $442M | $482M | $660M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $-52M | $-8M | $22M | $-10M |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 28.6% | 44.4% | 40.9% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -0.5% | -2.3% | 7.7% | -2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 44.1x | — | — | 9.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $220M | $586M | $0.00 | $124M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $5M | $24M | $3M | $20M |
CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) | 100 | 290.5 | +190.5% |
| The Children's Plac… (PLCE) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTRN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +105.1% vs PLCE's -38.0%
PLCE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DXLG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RCKY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.2%, EPS growth 94.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 250.3% 10Y total return vs CTRN's 176.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 49.3%, current ratio 2.82x
- 6.2% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5%
CATO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 18.7%
- Beta 0.88, yield 18.7%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30
- 18.7% yield, vs RCKY's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.2% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs PLCE's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 18.7% yield, vs RCKY's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.1% vs PLCE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs PLCE's -6.7%, ROIC 7.6% vs 2.6% |
CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCKY leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTRN leads 0 • PLCE leads 0 • DXLG leads 0 • CATO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCKY leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLCE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.9x DXLG's $442M. RCKY is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLCE's -4.0%. On growth, CTRN holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $801M | $1.3B | $442M | $482M | $660M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $26M | $5M | $47M | -$5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | -$52M | -$8M | $22M | -$10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $40M | -$11M | $10M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +28.6% | +44.4% | +40.9% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -0.5% | -2.3% | +7.7% | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -4.0% | -1.7% | +4.6% | -1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +3.1% | -2.6% | +2.0% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | -13.0% | -5.2% | +9.1% | +6.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -112.1% | -137.7% | +34.4% | +64.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DXLG and RCKY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RCKY's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLCE's 11.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $403M | $74M | $35M | $274M | $53M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $563M | $655M | $11M | $395M | $178M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | -0.74x | -0.97x | 12.26x | -3.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.08x | — | — | 9.89x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 14.34x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.61x | — | 8.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.05x | 0.08x | 0.57x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | — | 0.32x | 1.08x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.82x | 28.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCKY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCKY delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-15 for CTRN. RCKY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTRN's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCKY scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | — | -5.5% | +9.2% | -5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -6.7% | -1.9% | +4.7% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.1% | +2.6% | -6.8% | +7.6% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +8.2% | -6.4% | +9.9% | -9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | — | — | 0.49x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $159M | $581M | -$24M | $121M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $5M | $24M | $3M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $586M | $0 | $124M | $146M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.65x | -0.28x | — | 2.38x | -1.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CTRN and RCKY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCKY five years ago would be worth $6,012 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $416 for PLCE. Over the past 12 months, CTRN leads with a +105.1% total return vs PLCE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRN at 44.1% vs PLCE's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | -18.6% | -28.9% | +27.1% | -2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.1% | -38.0% | -35.6% | +91.9% | +27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.5% | -87.4% | -85.6% | +89.0% | -52.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.5% | -95.8% | -55.2% | -39.9% | -60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.4% | -86.3% | -88.1% | +250.3% | -72.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.1% | -49.9% | -47.6% | +23.6% | -21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTRN and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRN currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs PLCE's 35.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 2.28x | 2.30x | 1.36x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.51 | $9.56 | $1.69 | $48.70 | $4.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.68 | $2.76 | $0.43 | $18.86 | $2.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +35.1% | +37.9% | +74.5% | +59.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 48.9 | 58.2 | 34.6 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 362K | 144K | 63K | 60K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PLCE and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTRN as "Buy", RCKY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.2% upside for CTRN (target: $68) vs 43.3% for RCKY (target: $52). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.71% vs RCKY's 1.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | — | — | $52.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% | +18.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.62 | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.9% | +39.2% | +0.1% | +7.4% |
RCKY leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
CTRN vs PLCE vs DXLG vs RCKY vs CATO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) is the stronger pick with 6. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO?
On forward P/E, Rocky Brands, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO?
Over the past 5 years, Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) delivered a total return of -39. 9%, compared to -95. 8% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCKY returned +250. 3% versus DXLG's -88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning DXLG is approximately 160% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 195% for Citi Trends, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) is pulling ahead at 6. 2% versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocky Brands, Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CATO leads at -5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO?
Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCKY leads at 7. 7% versus -5. 2% for CTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXLG leads at 43. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Citi Trends, Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTRN: 44. 2% to $68. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
7% yield), RCKY (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CTRN, PLCE, DXLG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTRN or PLCE or DXLG or RCKY or CATO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88), 18. 7% yield). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CATO: -72. 3%, DXLG: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTRN and PLCE and DXLG and RCKY and CATO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKY is a small-cap deep-value stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. RCKY, CATO pay a dividend while CTRN, PLCE, DXLG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.