Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $38M | $1.92B | $9.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $674M | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-173M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | 75.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -44.2% | -27.2% | 19.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $290M | $559M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $103M | $152M |
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytosorbents Corpor… (CTSO) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Masimo Corporation (MASI) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTSO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.92
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 41.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.9%
- 14.5% revenue growth vs MASI's -27.1%
NVCR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MASI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 282.9% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 77.6%, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.49x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% revenue growth vs MASI's -27.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs CTSO's -27.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs CTSO's -31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs CTSO's -20.3%, ROIC 16.5% vs -40.5% |
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MASI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MASI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 43.2x CTSO's $36M. MASI is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTSO's -27.0%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $674M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | -$165M | $340M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$173M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$48M | $211M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.6% | +75.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.2% | -27.2% | +19.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.0% | -25.7% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.5% | -7.1% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +12.3% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +138.0% | -100.0% | +134.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CTSO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $1.9B | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $62M | $2.1B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | -13.80x | -63.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 32.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 27.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 2.92x | 6.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.99x | 5.51x | 13.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 47.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MASI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MASI delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-84 for CTSO. MASI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTSO's 2.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MASI scores 6/9 vs CTSO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.1% | -50.8% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.3% | -16.5% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.5% | -16.4% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.0% | -28.9% | +18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.42x | 0.85x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $187M | $407M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $103M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $290M | $559M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.48x | -96.80x | 12.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MASI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MASI five years ago would be worth $7,963 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $725 for CTSO. Over the past 12 months, MASI leads with a +18.9% total return vs CTSO's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MASI at -1.7% vs CTSO's -40.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +28.3% | +40.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.0% | +1.1% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | -75.7% | -4.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -91.3% | -20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | +30.3% | +282.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.1% | -37.6% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MASI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MASI is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MASI currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CTSO's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 2.20x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.39 | $20.06 | $179.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $9.82 | $125.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.8% | +83.9% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 69.8 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 1.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", MASI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 5.0% for MASI (target: $188).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $187.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
MASI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CTSO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTSO or NVCR or MASI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) is the stronger pick with 14.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTSO or NVCR or MASI?
Over the past 5 years, Masimo Corporation (MASI) delivered a total return of -20.
4%, compared to -92. 8% for Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MASI returned +282. 9% versus CTSO's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTSO or NVCR or MASI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 251% more volatile than MASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Masimo Corporation (MASI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 2% for Cytosorbents Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTSO or NVCR or MASI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) is pulling ahead at 14.
5% versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masimo Corporation grew EPS 51. 0% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVCR leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTSO or NVCR or MASI?
Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the more profitable company, earning -9.
9% net margin versus -58. 2% for Cytosorbents Corporation — meaning it keeps -9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MASI leads at 20. 5% versus -47. 2% for CTSO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CTSO or NVCR or MASI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CTSO or NVCR or MASI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CTSO or NVCR or MASI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), +282. 9% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MASI: +282. 9%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CTSO and NVCR and MASI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.