REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CUZ vs BXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
CUZ vs BXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $4.41B | $9.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $3.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $277M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.3% | 42.3% |
| Forward P/E | 97.7x | 35.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.68B | $17.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $1.48B |
CUZ vs BXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cousins Properties … (CUZ) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CUZ vs BXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CUZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth -20.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 27.2% 10Y total return vs BXP's -26.7%
BXP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.96, yield 6.8%, current ratio 2.28x
- Lower P/E (35.9x vs 97.7x)
- 8.0% margin vs CUZ's -0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.0% FFO/revenue growth vs BXP's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (35.9x vs 97.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.0% margin vs CUZ's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs BXP's 0.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BXP's 6.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.5% vs BXP's -1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs CUZ's -0.1%, ROIC 6.1% vs 2.0% |
CUZ vs BXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CUZ vs BXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 3.5x CUZ's $1.0B. BXP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CUZ's -0.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $646M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $277M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | $690M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +42.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BXP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.4x trailing earnings, BXP trades at a 69% valuation discount to CUZ's 111.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CUZ's 12.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 111.63x | 34.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 97.74x | 35.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.66x | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.44x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.65x | 13.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BXP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BXP delivers a 3.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-0 for CUZ. CUZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXP's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXP scores 6/9 vs CUZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $15.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $17.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CUZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CUZ five years ago would be worth $9,145 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,311 for BXP. Over the past 12 months, CUZ leads with a +1.5% total return vs BXP's -1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CUZ at 13.7% vs BXP's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | -10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | -1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.0% | +39.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | -26.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.2% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.7% | +11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CUZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CUZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BXP's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CUZ currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs BXP's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.81 | $79.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.03 | $49.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +75.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CUZ and BXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CUZ as "Buy" and BXP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for BXP (target: $72) vs 10.1% for CUZ (target: $30). For income investors, BXP offers the higher dividend yield at 6.76% vs CUZ's 4.77%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $72.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | $4.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BXP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CUZ leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CUZ vs BXP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CUZ or BXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for BXP, Inc. (BXP). BXP, Inc. (BXP) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (35. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CUZ or BXP?
On trailing P/E, BXP, Inc.
(BXP) is the cheapest at 34. 4x versus Cousins Properties Incorporated at 111. 6x. On forward P/E, BXP, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CUZ or BXP?
Over the past 5 years, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) delivered a total return of -8.
5%, compared to -26. 9% for BXP, Inc. (BXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +27. 2% versus BXP's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CUZ or BXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus BXP, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning BXP is approximately 20% more volatile than CUZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 2% for BXP, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CUZ or BXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.
0% versus 2. 2% for BXP, Inc. (BXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BXP, Inc. grew EPS 1833% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Cousins Properties Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CUZ or BXP?
BXP, Inc.
(BXP) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus 4. 1% for Cousins Properties Incorporated — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus 22. 4% for CUZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BXP leads at 60. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CUZ or BXP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BXP, Inc.
(BXP) trades at 35. 9x forward P/E versus 97. 7x for Cousins Properties Incorporated — 61. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BXP: 20. 5% to $72. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — CUZ or BXP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BXP, Inc. (BXP) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 4. 8% for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ).
09Is CUZ or BXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CUZ: +27. 2%, BXP: -26. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CUZ and BXP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.