CUZ vs DEA

For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 3% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the better valuation at 80. 3x trailing P/E (69. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is the cheapest at 80. 3x versus Cousins Properties Incorporated at 111. 6x. On forward P/E, Easterly Government Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 69. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) delivered a total return of -8.

5%, compared to -37. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +27. 2% versus DEA's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Cousins Properties Incorporated's 0. 80β — meaning CUZ is approximately 56% more volatile than DEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 123% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.

0% versus 11. 3% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cousins Properties Incorporated grew EPS -20. 0% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

1% net margin versus 3. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DEA leads at 24. 9% versus 22. 4% for CUZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CUZ leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) trades at 69. 5x forward P/E versus 97. 7x for Cousins Properties Incorporated — 28. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CUZ: 10. 1% to $29. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the highest yield at 9. 0%, versus 4. 8% for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 9. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DEA: -10. 5%, CUZ: +27. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; DEA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.