REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CUZ vs PDM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
CUZ vs PDM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $4.41B | $1.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $422M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.3% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 97.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $3.68B | $2.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $731K |
CUZ vs PDM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cousins Properties … (CUZ) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Piedmont Office Rea… (PDM) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CUZ vs PDM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CUZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth -20.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 27.2% 10Y total return vs PDM's -23.2%
PDM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +29.8% vs CUZ's +1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PDM's -0.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.5% margin vs PDM's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs PDM's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PDM's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.8% vs CUZ's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.1% ROA vs PDM's -2.2%, ROIC 2.0% vs 1.5% |
CUZ vs PDM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CUZ vs PDM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CUZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CUZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 2.4x PDM's $422M. CUZ is the more profitable business, keeping -0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDM's -20.5%. On growth, CUZ holds the edge at +5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $422M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $646M | $229M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -23.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PDM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PDM's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CUZ's 12.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 111.63x | -12.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 97.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.66x | 10.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.44x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CUZ leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUZ delivers a -0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PDM. CUZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PDM's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PDM scores 5/9 vs CUZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $731,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CUZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CUZ five years ago would be worth $9,145 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,046 for PDM. Over the past 12 months, PDM leads with a +29.8% total return vs CUZ's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CUZ at 13.7% vs PDM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.0% | +46.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | -39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.2% | -23.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CUZ and PDM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CUZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDM's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDM currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs CUZ's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.81 | $9.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.03 | $6.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CUZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CUZ as "Buy" and PDM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.3% upside for PDM (target: $10) vs 10.1% for CUZ (target: $30). For income investors, CUZ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.77% vs PDM's 2.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | $0.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CUZ leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PDM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CUZ vs PDM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CUZ or PDM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) offers the better valuation at 111. 6x trailing P/E (97. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CUZ or PDM?
Over the past 5 years, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) delivered a total return of -8.
5%, compared to -39. 5% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +27. 2% versus PDM's -23. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CUZ or PDM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning PDM is approximately 36% more volatile than CUZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 152% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CUZ or PDM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.
0% versus -0. 9% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS -4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Cousins Properties Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CUZ or PDM?
Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
1% net margin versus -14. 8% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CUZ leads at 22. 4% versus 14. 1% for PDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CUZ leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CUZ or PDM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDM: 18.
3% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CUZ or PDM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 2. 9% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM).
08Is CUZ or PDM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CUZ: +27. 2%, PDM: -23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CUZ and PDM?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; PDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.