REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CUZ vs VRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
CUZ vs VRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $4.41B | $1.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $291M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $70M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.3% | 14.7% |
| Forward P/E | 97.7x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.68B | $1.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $14M |
CUZ vs VRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cousins Properties … (CUZ) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Veris Residential, … (VRE) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CUZ vs VRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CUZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth -20.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 27.2% 10Y total return vs VRE's -12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 78.2%, current ratio 0.34x
VRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.7%
- Lower P/E (23.7x vs 97.7x)
- 24.2% margin vs CUZ's -0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.0% FFO/revenue growth vs VRE's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.7x vs 97.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.2% margin vs CUZ's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs CUZ's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VRE's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs CUZ's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs CUZ's -0.1%, ROIC 1.3% vs 2.0% |
CUZ vs VRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CUZ vs VRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CUZ and VRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CUZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 3.5x VRE's $291M. VRE is the more profitable business, keeping 24.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CUZ's -0.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $291M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $646M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | $50M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +24.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -36.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CUZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, VRE trades at a 79% valuation discount to CUZ's 111.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CUZ's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRE's 23.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 111.63x | 23.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 97.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.66x | 23.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.44x | 6.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.65x | 32.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRE delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-0 for CUZ. CUZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRE's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRE scores 7/9 vs CUZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CUZ and VRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRE five years ago would be worth $11,436 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,145 for CUZ. Over the past 12 months, VRE leads with a +21.7% total return vs CUZ's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CUZ at 13.7% vs VRE's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.0% | +21.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +14.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.2% | -12.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.7% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
VRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUZ's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRE currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CUZ's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.81 | $19.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.03 | $13.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CUZ and VRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CUZ as "Buy" and VRE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.1% upside for CUZ (target: $30) vs -26.1% for VRE (target: $14). For income investors, CUZ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.77% vs VRE's 1.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
VRE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). CUZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CUZ vs VRE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CUZ or VRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CUZ or VRE?
On trailing P/E, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus Cousins Properties Incorporated at 111. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CUZ or VRE?
Over the past 5 years, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) delivered a total return of +14. 4%, compared to -8. 5% for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +27. 2% versus VRE's -12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CUZ or VRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Cousins Properties Incorporated's 0. 80β — meaning CUZ is approximately 261% more volatile than VRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 107% for Veris Residential, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CUZ or VRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.
0% versus 6. 4% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veris Residential, Inc. grew EPS 420. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Cousins Properties Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CUZ or VRE?
Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 4. 1% for Cousins Properties Incorporated — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CUZ leads at 22. 4% versus 17. 1% for VRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CUZ leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CUZ or VRE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CUZ: 10.
1% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CUZ or VRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 1. 7% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE).
09Is CUZ or VRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRE: -12. 8%, CUZ: +27. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CUZ and VRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.