Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.57B | $4.05B | $3.17B | $22.46B | $42.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.20B | $2.64B | $3.94B | $16.83B | $33.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $269M | $214M | $136M | $2.04B | $3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 26.3% | 22.5% | 26.1% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 9.8% | 7.0% | 16.4% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 19.4x | 18.2x | 11.7x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $45M | $131M | $1.64B | $2.40B | $6.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $356M | $610M | $26M | $2.01B | $2.99B |
CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 253.6 | +153.6% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 295.0 | +195.0% |
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 275.8 | +175.8% |
| PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) | 100 | 344.1 | +244.1% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVCO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 12.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5%
- 18.2% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.6%
SKY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs PHM's 5.7%
- 22.7% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9%
PATK is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PHM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.71 vs DHI's 1.09
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 13.7x), PEG 0.71 vs 1.09
DHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85 vs CVCO's 1.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 13.7x), PEG 0.71 vs 1.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs CVCO's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs SKY's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.6% |
CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
PHM leads 1 • SKY leads 0 • PATK leads 0 • DHI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVCO leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 15.1x CVCO's $2.2B. CVCO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PATK's 3.5%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $2.6B | $3.9B | $16.8B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $221M | $306M | $445M | $2.8B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $269M | $214M | $136M | $2.0B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $205M | $260M | $194M | $1.6B | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +26.3% | +22.5% | +26.1% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +9.8% | +7.0% | +16.4% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +8.1% | +3.5% | +12.1% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +9.9% | +4.9% | +9.8% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | +1.8% | -0.6% | -12.4% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.1% | -3.0% | -0.9% | -30.4% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PHM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, PHM trades at a 57% valuation discount to PATK's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PHM offers better value at 0.64x vs CVCO's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $4.1B | $3.2B | $22.5B | $42.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $3.6B | $4.8B | $22.9B | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.29x | 21.43x | 24.45x | 10.51x | 12.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 19.44x | 18.24x | 11.68x | 13.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.13x | 0.78x | — | 0.64x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.32x | 12.69x | 10.72x | 7.35x | 10.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 1.63x | 0.80x | 1.30x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.74x | 2.76x | 2.79x | 1.80x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.09x | 21.29x | 12.86x | 12.84x | 12.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $12 for PATK. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs DHI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.7% | +13.4% | +11.6% | +15.9% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.2% | +10.1% | +4.4% | +11.4% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.4% | +16.9% | +7.6% | +17.2% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +14.8% | +10.2% | +20.0% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.08x | 1.39x | 0.19x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$311M | -$479M | $1.6B | $394M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $356M | $610M | $26M | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45M | $131M | $1.6B | $2.4B | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 211.73x | 51.32x | 3.40x | 5590.17x | 44.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PATK and DHI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $22,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,674 for DHI. Over the past 12 months, DHI leads with a +20.3% total return vs SKY's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.7% vs SKY's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.5% | -13.7% | -13.2% | -1.6% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.0% | -16.3% | +19.6% | +16.3% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.7% | -2.6% | +128.2% | +76.2% | +38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.5% | +64.0% | +56.6% | +95.4% | +46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +448.0% | +714.5% | +395.2% | +571.2% | +424.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.4% | -0.9% | +31.7% | +20.8% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHM and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVCO's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHM currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs PATK's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.96x | 0.93x | 1.01x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $713.01 | $99.17 | $148.50 | $144.27 | $184.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $393.53 | $59.44 | $80.35 | $95.20 | $114.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.6% | +73.9% | +64.2% | +81.0% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 46.0 | 42.8 | 46.5 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 500K | 469K | 1.7M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PATK and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVCO as "Buy", SKY as "Buy", PATK as "Buy", PHM as "Hold", DHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475). For income investors, PATK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.67% vs PHM's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $475.00 | $106.00 | $126.50 | $141.22 | $163.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | 17 | 44 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.60 | $0.89 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +2.0% | +1.0% | +5.5% | +10.1% |
CVCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PHM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CVCO vs SKY vs PATK vs PHM vs DHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI?
On trailing P/E, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, PulteGroup, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PulteGroup, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. 's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI?
Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) delivered a total return of +123. 5%, compared to +46. 7% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +714. 5% versus PATK's +395. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning CVCO is approximately 42% more volatile than DHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -24. 3% for PulteGroup, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI?
PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus 3. 4% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHM leads at 17. 3% versus 7. 0% for PATK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHM leads at 26. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus D. R. Horton, Inc. 's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 44. 7% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI?
In this comparison, PATK (1.
7% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), PHM (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CVCO, SKY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CVCO or SKY or PATK or PHM or DHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, CVCO: +448. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVCO and SKY and PATK and PHM and DHI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PHM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PATK, PHM, DHI pay a dividend while CVCO, SKY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.