Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVKD vs TCRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CVKD vs TCRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $15M | $157M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $8M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-124M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -15.8% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $94M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $152M |
CVKD vs TCRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cadrenal Therapeuti… (CVKD) | 100 | 14.4 | -85.6% |
| TScan Therapeutics,… (TCRX) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVKD vs TCRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVKD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.12
- EPS growth 23.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.12, current ratio 2.72x
TCRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -88.5% 10Y total return vs CVKD's -90.3%
- 266.7% revenue growth vs CVKD's -52.9%
- -11.0% vs CVKD's -63.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 266.7% revenue growth vs CVKD's -52.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs TCRX's -15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.12 vs TCRX's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -11.0% vs CVKD's -63.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -50.1% ROA vs CVKD's -217.7% |
CVKD vs TCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CVKD vs TCRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVKD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCRX and CVKD operate at a comparable scale, with $8M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $8M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$124M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$125M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +81.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.2% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $157M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $99M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.91x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 15.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.38x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TCRX delivers a -91.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-92 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CVKD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCRX scores 2/9 vs CVKD's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | -91.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | -50.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -90.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -49.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$58M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $94M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -73.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCRX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCRX five years ago would be worth $1,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $974 for CVKD. Over the past 12 months, TCRX leads with a -11.0% total return vs CVKD's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCRX at -18.7% vs CVKD's -34.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.9% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.0% | -11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | -46.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -88.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.4% | -18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVKD and TCRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVKD is the less volatile stock with a 2.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCRX's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCRX currently trades 47.1% from its 52-week high vs CVKD's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $2.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $0.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.5% | +47.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 910K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% |
TCRX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVKD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CVKD vs TCRX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVKD or TCRX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate TScan Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CVKD or TCRX?
Over the past 5 years, TScan Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRX) delivered a total return of -88. 5%, compared to -90. 3% for Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (CVKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCRX returned -88. 5% versus CVKD's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CVKD or TCRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock (CVKD) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 12β versus TScan Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning TCRX is approximately 11% more volatile than CVKD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CVKD or TCRX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 3% for TScan Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CVKD or TCRX?
Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock (CVKD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1256. 8% for TScan Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVKD leads at 0. 0% versus -1315. 4% for TCRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCRX leads at 72. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CVKD or TCRX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CVKD or TCRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TScan Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (CVKD) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCRX: -88. 5%, CVKD: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CVKD and TCRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TCRX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.