Trucking
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Trucking
CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $833M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $72M | $71M | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 10.0x | — | 39.8x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $8.76B | $32M | $752M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $296M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $60M |
CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Covenant Logistics … (CVLG) | 100 | 359.0 | +259.0% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| Werner Enterprises,… (WERN) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVLG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 0.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 0.7% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 1.8% vs -0.1%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 39.8x)
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs CVLG's 234.5%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs WERN's +45.8%
WERN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 54.1%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 1.24, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 1.24 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 39.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.6% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CVLG's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs WERN's +45.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 1.8% vs -0.1% |
CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WERN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVLG leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CVLG and ASTS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WERN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 41.9x ASTS's $71M. CVLG is the more profitable business, keeping 0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $72M | $71M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113M | -$74M | -$237M | $343M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $114M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | -26.9% | +27.3% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CVLG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 92% valuation discount to CVLG's 122.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CVLG's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WERN's 8.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $833M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $876M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 122.91x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -151.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.31x | — | — | 39.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.74x | — | — | 8.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SPIR and ASTS and WERN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVLG delivers a 1.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVLG's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs CVLG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.7% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $296M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $8.8B | $32M | $752M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs WERN's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs WERN's -5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.1% | +106.4% | -21.7% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.0% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.8% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -16.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.6% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +234.5% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +78.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.0% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WERN is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WERN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.91 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $38.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.00 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $23.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 65.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 149K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVLG as "Hold", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", WERN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs -0.8% for WERN (target: $36). For income investors, WERN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs CVLG's 0.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | $36.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 12 | 7 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | — | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
WERN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). CVLG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CVLG vs SPIR vs ASTS vs WERN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. at 122. 9x. On forward P/E, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 137% more volatile than WERN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 84% for Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -143. 6% for Werner Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WERN leads at 2. 3% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.
(CVLG) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — 20. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58. 6% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN?
In this comparison, WERN (1.
5% yield), CVLG (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CVLG or SPIR or ASTS or WERN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), 1. 5% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WERN: +78. 1%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVLG and SPIR and ASTS and WERN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CVLG (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and WERN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CVLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WERN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CVLG, WERN pay a dividend while SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.