Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVLT vs QLYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
CVLT vs QLYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $4.55B | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $685M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 80.3% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 33.7% |
| Forward P/E | 24.7x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $918M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $900M | $250M |
CVLT vs QLYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commvault Systems, … (CVLT) | 100 | 255.5 | +155.5% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVLT vs QLYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVLT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.9%, EPS growth -6.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.7%
- 18.9% revenue growth vs QLYS's 10.1%
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.53
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs CVLT's 139.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.9% revenue growth vs QLYS's 10.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 24.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs CVLT's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs CVLT's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.6% vs CVLT's -40.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs CVLT's 4.0%, ROIC 47.5% vs 268.6% |
CVLT vs QLYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVLT vs QLYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVLT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 1.7x QLYS's $685M. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVLT's 6.0%. On growth, CVLT holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $685M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $237M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.3% | +83.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +33.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +29.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +42.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.7% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
QLYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, QLYS trades at a 73% valuation discount to CVLT's 65.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QLYS's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVLT's 39.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 65.43x | 17.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.71x | 12.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.36x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 5.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 616.00x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.17x | 10.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $35 for CVLT. QLYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVLT's 122.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QLYS scores 6/9 vs CVLT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.4% | +37.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +47.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +37.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 122.43x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$153M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $900M | $250M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $918M | $97M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.83x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVLT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVLT five years ago would be worth $15,169 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,694 for QLYS. Over the past 12 months, QLYS leads with a -25.6% total return vs CVLT's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVLT at 18.8% vs QLYS's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.7% | -27.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.8% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | -17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.7% | -3.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.7% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | -6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
QLYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVLT's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QLYS currently trades 61.1% from its 52-week high vs CVLT's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $200.68 | $155.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.75 | $74.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.5% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 773K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVLT as "Buy" and QLYS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 41.5% upside for QLYS (target: $134) vs 37.0% for CVLT (target: $142).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $141.64 | $134.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | +5.5% |
QLYS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CVLT leads in 1 (Total Returns).
CVLT vs QLYS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVLT or QLYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Commvault Systems, Inc.
(CVLT) is the stronger pick with 18. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVLT or QLYS?
On trailing P/E, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Commvault Systems, Inc. at 65. 4x. On forward P/E, Qualys, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVLT or QLYS?
Over the past 5 years, Commvault Systems, Inc.
(CVLT) delivered a total return of +51. 7%, compared to -3. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +267. 2% versus CVLT's +139. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVLT or QLYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Commvault Systems, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning CVLT is approximately 128% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 122% for Commvault Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVLT or QLYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Commvault Systems, Inc.
(CVLT) is pulling ahead at 18. 9% versus 10. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qualys, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -6. 0% for Commvault Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVLT leads at 14. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVLT or QLYS?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus 6. 0% for Commvault Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus 8. 9% for CVLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVLT or QLYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 7x for Commvault Systems, Inc. — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QLYS: 41. 5% to $134. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVLT or QLYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CVLT or QLYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +267. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +267. 2%, CVLT: +139. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVLT and QLYS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVLT is a small-cap high-growth stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.