CWAN vs VRSK

For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 22. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) delivered a total return of +1. 8%, compared to -4. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRSK returned +132. 0% versus CWAN's -4. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning CWAN is approximately -2319% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verisk Analytics, Inc. grew EPS -3. 3% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -5. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRSK leads at 44. 6% versus -1. 1% for CWAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRSK leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 6x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRSK: 35. 3% to $231. 25.

In this comparison, VRSK (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. CWAN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 1% yield, +132. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +132. 0%, CWAN: -4. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CWAN (Technology) and VRSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VRSK pays a dividend while CWAN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.