Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $494M | $2.88B | $896.00B | $355.61B | $79.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $194M | $644M | $280.33B | $49.28B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $209M | $57.05B | $13.70B | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 79.7% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 43.7% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 14.7x | 14.4x | 25.3x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $991M | $942.38B | $45.49B | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $108M | $343.34B | $10.27B | $837M |
CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community West Banc… (CWBC) | 100 | 305.8 | +205.8% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CWBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 344.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 34.8%, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.78, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.63x
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 32.5% margin vs CWBC's 19.7%
- 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CWBC's 304.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs CVBF's 4.64
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 13.1% ROA vs CWBC's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs CWBC's 19.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.9% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CWBC's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0% |
CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
CWBC leads 1 • KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • ICE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1445.5x CWBC's $194M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWBC's 19.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $194M | $644M | $280.3B | $49.3B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $294M | $81.4B | $15.5B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $209M | $57.0B | $13.7B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $44M | $217M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +79.7% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +43.7% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +32.5% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +33.7% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.1% | +11.1% | +16.0% | +18.2% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CWBC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, CWBC trades at a 53% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $494M | $2.9B | $896.0B | $355.6B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $3.8B | $1.50T | $390.8B | $99.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.88x | 13.97x | 16.00x | 27.18x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.89x | 14.74x | 14.40x | 25.27x | 17.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.99x | 4.40x | 0.90x | 2.43x | 2.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.85x | 13.37x | 18.36x | 26.39x | 15.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 4.48x | 3.20x | 7.42x | 6.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.26x | 2.47x | 10.40x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.32x | 13.26x | 8.88x | 67.15x | 18.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. CWBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +9.3% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +6.8% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +9.3% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.43x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $883M | $599.0B | $35.2B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $108M | $343.3B | $10.3B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $991M | $942.4B | $45.5B | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.06x | 2.12x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, CWBC leads with a +40.9% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +14.8% | -0.5% | +20.3% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.9% | +16.3% | +21.8% | +17.2% | -20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.6% | +64.4% | +138.2% | +47.0% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.4% | +15.2% | +118.2% | +65.6% | +30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +304.9% | +66.9% | +465.8% | +121.1% | +195.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.5% | +18.0% | +33.6% | +13.7% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWBC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.81x | 0.94x | -0.20x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.80 | $21.48 | $337.25 | $84.04 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.98 | $17.95 | $262.71 | $65.35 | $136.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +98.8% | +95.1% | +98.3% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 60.1 | 59.1 | 60.6 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 1.6M | 7.0M | 12.7M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWBC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs ICE's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.75 | $24.75 | $339.75 | $86.13 | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 16 | 61 | 48 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +3.8% | +1.9% | +2.5% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 56 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $0.82 | $5.95 | $2.04 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.8% | +3.9% | +0.2% | +1.7% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CWBC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CWBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Community West Bancshares (CWBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Community West Bancshares (CWBC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the cheapest at 12.
9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Community West Bancshares is actually cheaper at 11. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community West Bancshares grew EPS 344. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 19. 6% for Community West Bancshares — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is CWBC or CVBF or JPM or KO or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWBC and CVBF and JPM and KO and ICE?
These companies operate in different sectors (CWBC (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CWBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.