Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.+64.4%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+122.1%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+455.2%

CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CXDO logoCXDO
NFLX logoNFLX
AMZN logoAMZN
GOOGL logoGOOGL
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesEntertainmentSpecialty RetailInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$317M$374.00B$2.92T$4.81T
Revenue (TTM)$73M$45.18B$742.78B$422.57B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$10.98B$90.80B$160.21B
Gross Margin71.5%48.5%50.6%60.4%
Operating Margin5.5%29.5%11.5%32.7%
Forward P/E26.0x24.8x34.8x29.6x
Total Debt$1M$14.46B$152.99B$59.29B
Cash & Equiv.$31M$9.03B$86.81B$30.71B

CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CXDO
NFLX
AMZN
GOOGL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO)100164.4+64.4%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100222.1+122.1%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100555.2+455.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Netflix, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
The Quality Angle

CXDO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: communication services exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Growth Play

NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • PEG 0.75 vs AMZN's 1.24
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs CXDO's 12.0%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Secondary Option

AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Income Pick

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • 37.9% margin vs CXDO's 6.1%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs CXDO's 12.0%
ValueNFLX logoNFLXLower P/E (24.8x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.75 vs 0.99
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs CXDO's 6.1%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs CXDO's 1.86
DividendsGOOGL logoGOOGL0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+163.5% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs CXDO's 5.7%, ROIC 25.1% vs 10.2%

CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CXDOCrexendo, Inc.
FY 2024
Cloud Telecommunications Segment
100.0%$37M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000

CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGAMZN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 10200.2x CXDO's $73M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CXDO's 6.1%. On growth, CXDO holds the edge at +29.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$73M$45.2B$742.8B$422.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$30.1B$155.9B$161.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$11.0B$90.8B$160.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$9.5B-$2.5B$73.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.5%+48.5%+50.6%+60.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.5%+29.5%+11.5%+32.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%+24.3%+12.2%+37.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.8%+20.9%-0.3%+17.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.0%+17.6%+16.6%+21.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-46.9%+31.1%+74.8%+81.9%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 43% valuation discount to CXDO's 61.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Market CapShares × price$317M$374.0B$2.92T$4.81T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$287M$379.4B$2.98T$4.84T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS61.13x34.89x37.82x36.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.96x24.80x34.77x29.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x1.35x1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.91x12.61x20.47x32.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.65x8.28x4.07x11.95x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.85x14.32x7.14x11.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.17x39.53x378.98x65.72x
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CXDO and NFLX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for CXDO. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+41.3%+23.3%+39.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+19.8%+11.5%+27.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.2%+29.8%+14.7%+25.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.9%+30.5%+15.3%+30.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97767
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.54x0.37x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M$5.4B$66.2B$28.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$31M$9.0B$86.8B$30.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$14.5B$153.0B$59.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense283.68x17.33x39.96x392.15x
Evenly matched — CXDO and NFLX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CXDO and GOOGL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs AMZN's 36.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.5%-3.0%+19.7%+26.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+86.3%-23.6%+43.7%+163.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+526.9%+166.5%+156.2%+270.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.4%+75.2%+64.8%+239.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+636.8%+875.3%+697.8%+996.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+84.4%+38.6%+36.8%+54.8%
Evenly matched — CXDO and GOOGL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CXDO's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.86x0.39x1.51x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.84$134.12$278.56$400.10
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.07$75.01$185.01$147.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.4%+65.8%+97.3%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10084.335.381.183.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded243K44.0M45.5M28.3M
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CXDO as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$116.29$306.77$406.28
# AnalystsCovering analysts6999482
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.4%0.0%+0.9%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). NFLX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CXDO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Crexendo, Inc. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to +64. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus CXDO's +636. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Crexendo, Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning CXDO is approximately 378% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 12. 0% for Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crexendo, Inc. grew EPS 186. 2% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 7. 4% for Crexendo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 6. 9% for CXDO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

In this comparison, GOOGL (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CXDO, NFLX, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CXDO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, CXDO: +636. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CXDO and NFLX and AMZN and GOOGL?

These companies operate in different sectors (CXDO (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CXDO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CXDO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CXDO and NFLX and AMZN and GOOGL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CXDO: 29.0% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(CXDO: 6.1% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CXDO: 61.1x · NFLX: 34.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.