Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CXDO vs OOMA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
CXDO vs OOMA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $317M | $517M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73M | $274M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.0x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $20M |
CXDO vs OOMA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Ooma, Inc. (OOMA) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXDO vs OOMA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CXDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 186.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs OOMA's 194.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.86, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.40x
OOMA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.01
- Beta 1.01, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 26.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs OOMA's 6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 26.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.1% margin vs OOMA's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs CXDO's 1.86 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.3% vs OOMA's +48.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs OOMA's 3.8%, ROIC 10.2% vs 3.7% |
CXDO vs OOMA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CXDO vs OOMA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OOMA is the larger business by revenue, generating $274M annually — 3.8x CXDO's $73M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.1% (CXDO) to 2.4% (OOMA). On growth, CXDO holds the edge at +29.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73M | $274M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +61.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.0% | +14.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.9% | — |
Valuation Metrics
OOMA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 61.1x trailing earnings, CXDO trades at a 26% valuation discount to OOMA's 82.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OOMA's 27.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CXDO's 35.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $517M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $514M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.13x | 82.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.96x | 14.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.91x | 27.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 5.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CXDO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OOMA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $7 for CXDO. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OOMA's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs OOMA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 283.68x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CXDO five years ago would be worth $18,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,585 for OOMA. Over the past 12 months, CXDO leads with a +86.3% total return vs OOMA's +48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs OOMA's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.5% | +70.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +48.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +526.9% | +60.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | +15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +636.8% | +194.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +84.4% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CXDO and OOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OOMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CXDO's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.84 | $19.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.07 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 84.3 | 82.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 243K | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CXDO as "Buy" and OOMA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.2% upside for CXDO (target: $10) vs -5.3% for OOMA (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
CXDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OOMA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CXDO vs OOMA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXDO or OOMA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) offers the better valuation at 61. 1x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXDO or OOMA?
On trailing P/E, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the cheapest at 61. 1x versus Ooma, Inc. at 82. 6x. On forward P/E, Ooma, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or OOMA?
Over the past 5 years, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to +15. 9% for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXDO returned +636. 8% versus OOMA's +194. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXDO or OOMA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ooma, Inc.
(OOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Crexendo, Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning CXDO is approximately 84% more volatile than OOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 19% for Ooma, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXDO or OOMA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 6. 5% for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ooma, Inc. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to 186. 2% for Crexendo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXDO or OOMA?
Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 2. 4% for Ooma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CXDO leads at 6. 9% versus 1. 6% for OOMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXDO or OOMA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ooma, Inc.
(OOMA) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Crexendo, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CXDO: 2. 2% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or OOMA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CXDO or OOMA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ooma, Inc.
(OOMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +194. 6% 10Y return). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OOMA: +194. 6%, CXDO: +636. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXDO and OOMA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 7%
- Gross Margin > 36%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.