Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CXDO vs OOMA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.+64.4%
OOMA
Ooma, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$517M
5Y Perf.+51.5%

CXDO vs OOMA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CXDO logoCXDO
OOMA logoOOMA
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$317M$517M
Revenue (TTM)$73M$274M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$6M
Gross Margin71.5%61.1%
Operating Margin5.5%1.9%
Forward P/E26.0x14.8x
Total Debt$1M$17M
Cash & Equiv.$31M$20M

CXDO vs OOMALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CXDO
OOMA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO)100164.4+64.4%
Ooma, Inc. (OOMA)100151.5+51.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CXDO vs OOMA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CXDO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Ooma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
The Growth Play

CXDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 186.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
  • 6.4% 10Y total return vs OOMA's 194.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.86, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.40x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
OOMA
Ooma, Inc.
The Income Pick

OOMA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • beta 1.01
  • Beta 1.01, current ratio 0.93x
  • Lower P/E (14.8x vs 26.0x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCXDO logoCXDO12.0% revenue growth vs OOMA's 6.5%
ValueOOMA logoOOMALower P/E (14.8x vs 26.0x)
Quality / MarginsCXDO logoCXDO6.1% margin vs OOMA's 2.4%
Stability / SafetyOOMA logoOOMABeta 1.01 vs CXDO's 1.86
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CXDO logoCXDO+86.3% vs OOMA's +48.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CXDO logoCXDO5.7% ROA vs OOMA's 3.8%, ROIC 10.2% vs 3.7%

CXDO vs OOMA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CXDOCrexendo, Inc.
FY 2024
Cloud Telecommunications Segment
100.0%$37M
OOMAOoma, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription And Services Revenue
92.9%$239M
Product And Other Revenue
7.1%$18M

CXDO vs OOMA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCXDOLAGGINGOOMA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

OOMA is the larger business by revenue, generating $274M annually — 3.8x CXDO's $73M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.1% (CXDO) to 2.4% (OOMA). On growth, CXDO holds the edge at +29.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$73M$274M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$20M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M-$42M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.5%+61.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.5%+1.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%+2.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.8%-15.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.0%+14.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-46.9%
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OOMA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 61.1x trailing earnings, CXDO trades at a 26% valuation discount to OOMA's 82.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OOMA's 27.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CXDO's 35.9x.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$317M$517M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$287M$514M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS61.13x82.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.96x14.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.91x27.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.65x1.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.85x5.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.17x
OOMA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CXDO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

OOMA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $7 for CXDO. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OOMA's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs OOMA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.2%+3.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.9%+3.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M-$3M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$31M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$17M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense283.68x
CXDO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CXDO five years ago would be worth $18,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,585 for OOMA. Over the past 12 months, CXDO leads with a +86.3% total return vs OOMA's +48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs OOMA's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.5%+70.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+86.3%+48.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+526.9%+60.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.4%+15.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+636.8%+194.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+84.4%+17.2%
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CXDO and OOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OOMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CXDO's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.86x1.01x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.84$19.26
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.07$9.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.4%+98.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10084.382.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded243K266K
Evenly matched — CXDO and OOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates CXDO as "Buy" and OOMA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.2% upside for CXDO (target: $10) vs -5.3% for OOMA (target: $18).

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts615
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CXDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OOMA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCrexendo, Inc. (CXDO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CXDO vs OOMA: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CXDO or OOMA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) offers the better valuation at 61. 1x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CXDO or OOMA?

On trailing P/E, Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is the cheapest at 61. 1x versus Ooma, Inc. at 82. 6x. On forward P/E, Ooma, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or OOMA?

Over the past 5 years, Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to +15. 9% for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXDO returned +636. 8% versus OOMA's +194. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CXDO or OOMA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ooma, Inc.

(OOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Crexendo, Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning CXDO is approximately 84% more volatile than OOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 19% for Ooma, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CXDO or OOMA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 6. 5% for Ooma, Inc. (OOMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ooma, Inc. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to 186. 2% for Crexendo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CXDO or OOMA?

Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 2. 4% for Ooma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CXDO leads at 6. 9% versus 1. 6% for OOMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CXDO or OOMA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ooma, Inc.

(OOMA) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Crexendo, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CXDO: 2. 2% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or OOMA?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CXDO or OOMA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ooma, Inc.

(OOMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +194. 6% 10Y return). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OOMA: +194. 6%, CXDO: +636. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CXDO and OOMA?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CXDO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OOMA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CXDO and OOMA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CXDO: 29.0% · OOMA: 14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(CXDO: 6.1% · OOMA: 2.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CXDO: 61.1x · OOMA: 82.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.