Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CXT vs CIX vs VRNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Software - Infrastructure
CXT vs CIX vs VRNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Security & Protection Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.52B | $293M | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $159M | $894M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $20M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 42.0% | 31.1% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 15.0% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 88.0x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.14B | $0.00 | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $54M | $216M |
CXT vs CIX vs VRNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crane NXT, Co. (CXT) | 100 | 226.8 | +126.8% |
| CompX International… (CIX) | 100 | 168.8 | +68.8% |
| Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXT vs CIX vs VRNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CXT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth -21.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- 11.4% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1%
CIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 9.3%
- 223.2% 10Y total return vs CXT's 164.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 5.87x
VRNT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.36 vs CIX's 6.40
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 88.0x), PEG 0.36 vs 6.40
- +17.9% vs CXT's -6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.4% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 88.0x), PEG 0.36 vs 6.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs VRNT's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs CXT's 1.40 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, vs CXT's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs CXT's -6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs VRNT's 2.8%, ROIC 20.0% vs 5.3% |
CXT vs CIX vs VRNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CXT vs CIX vs VRNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CXT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 10.8x CIX's $159M. CIX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRNT's 6.9%. On growth, CXT holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $159M | $894M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $314M | $26M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $20M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $206M | $22M | $118M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.0% | +31.1% | +69.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +15.0% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +12.7% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +13.9% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +0.7% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.1% | +14.3% | -5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VRNT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, CIX trades at a 24% valuation discount to VRNT's 19.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VRNT offers better value at 1.02x vs CIX's 1.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $293M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $239M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.55x | 15.03x | 19.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.27x | 87.96x | 7.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.09x | 1.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.27x | 9.09x | 9.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.52x | 1.85x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 2.11x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.73x | 15.30x | 8.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $5 for VRNT. VRNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CXT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRNT scores 7/9 vs CXT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +14.3% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +12.8% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +20.0% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | +15.8% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | — | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $906M | -$54M | $233M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $54M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $0 | $448M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.51x | — | 8.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIX five years ago would be worth $14,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,395 for VRNT. Over the past 12 months, VRNT leads with a +17.9% total return vs CXT's -6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIX at 16.1% vs VRNT's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | +4.6% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.4% | +0.2% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.5% | +56.6% | -39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.6% | +46.0% | -56.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.8% | +223.2% | -37.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +16.1% | -15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIX and VRNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CXT's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRNT currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs CXT's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.50x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.00 | $32.30 | $22.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.23 | $20.29 | $16.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.6% | +73.5% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 64.7 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 687K | 3K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CXT and CIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CXT as "Buy", VRNT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.8% upside for VRNT (target: $33) vs 47.0% for CXT (target: $65). For income investors, CIX offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs CXT's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | — | $32.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +9.3% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.67 | $2.20 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.8% |
CIX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CXT vs CIX vs VRNT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXT or CIX or VRNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crane NXT, Co.
(CXT) is the stronger pick with 11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (88. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crane NXT, Co. (CXT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXT or CIX or VRNT?
On trailing P/E, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Verint Systems Inc. at 19. 7x. On forward P/E, Verint Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Verint Systems Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXT or CIX or VRNT?
Over the past 5 years, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) delivered a total return of +46. 0%, compared to -56. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIX returned +223. 2% versus VRNT's -37. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXT or CIX or VRNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Crane NXT, Co. 's 1. 40β — meaning CXT is approximately 180% more volatile than CIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 91% for Crane NXT, Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXT or CIX or VRNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crane NXT, Co.
(CXT) is pulling ahead at 11. 4% versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verint Systems Inc. grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -21. 6% for Crane NXT, Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXT leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXT or CIX or VRNT?
CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus 8. 8% for Crane NXT, Co. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CXT leads at 15. 9% versus 11. 7% for VRNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRNT leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXT or CIX or VRNT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CompX International Inc. — 81. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRNT: 58. 8% to $32. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXT or CIX or VRNT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 1. 5% for Crane NXT, Co. (CXT).
09Is CXT or CIX or VRNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 9. 3% yield, +223. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIX: +223. 2%, VRNT: -37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXT and CIX and VRNT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXT (Industrials) and CIX (Industrials) and VRNT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CXT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.