Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Semiconductors
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Medical - Devices | Semiconductors | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $14M | $3M | $4.97T | $146.00B | $119.57B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $276K | $0.00 | $253.49B | $10.58B | $25.12B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-42M | $159.61B | $2.98B | $3.25B | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | — | 74.1% | 66.3% | 63.5% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -99.2% | — | 64.0% | 30.5% | 22.4% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 23.0x | 39.6x | 20.8x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $8M | $11.41B | $303M | $14.86B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $990K | $3M | $10.61B | $3.37B | $4.01B | $343.34B | $10.27B |
CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyngn Inc. (CYN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Vicarious Surgical … (RBOT) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 802.3 | +702.3% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 188.8 | +88.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 7 stocks, CYN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RBOT doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 174.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- PEG 0.24 vs KO's 2.26
- 65.5% revenue growth vs CYN's -40.5%
- 63.0% margin vs CYN's -94.2%
ISRG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.39, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.89x
- Beta 0.39 vs RBOT's 2.42, lower leverage
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs CYN's -40.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 63.0% margin vs CYN's -94.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs RBOT's 2.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.7% vs RBOT's -94.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 83.1% ROA vs RBOT's -164.5%, ROIC 81.8% vs -116.2% |
CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • JPM leads 1 • CYN leads 0 • RBOT leads 0 • ISRG leads 0 • SYK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and RBOT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 63.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CYN's -94.2%. On growth, CYN holds the edge at +121.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $276,397 | $0 | $253.5B | $10.6B | $25.1B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | -$41M | $165.5B | $3.8B | $6.3B | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$42M | $159.6B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$40M | $119.1B | $2.8B | $4.3B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | — | +74.1% | +66.3% | +63.5% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -99.2% | — | +64.0% | +30.5% | +22.4% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -94.2% | — | +63.0% | +28.2% | +12.9% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -97.1% | — | +47.0% | +26.8% | +17.1% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.8% | — | +85.2% | +23.0% | +11.4% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.1% | +58.1% | +2.1% | +18.8% | +56.0% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 69% valuation discount to ISRG's 52.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.44x vs SYK's 2.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $3M | $4.97T | $146.0B | $119.6B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $9M | $4.97T | $142.9B | $130.4B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.24x | -0.06x | 41.87x | 52.23x | 37.17x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.98x | 39.57x | 20.84x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.44x | 2.40x | 2.50x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 37.30x | 39.46x | 21.44x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 62.34x | — | 23.01x | 14.51x | 4.76x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.15x | 0.31x | 31.97x | 8.31x | 5.32x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 51.40x | 58.62x | 27.92x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-3 for RBOT. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs RBOT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.6% | -3.3% | +111.7% | +16.9% | +15.0% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.1% | -164.5% | +83.1% | +14.8% | +6.9% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -117.2% | -116.2% | +81.8% | +15.0% | +11.4% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.5% | -134.6% | +97.2% | +16.5% | +13.0% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.79x | 0.07x | 0.02x | 0.66x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $5M | $807M | -$3.1B | $10.8B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $990,023 | $3M | $10.6B | $3.4B | $4.0B | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $8M | $11.4B | $303M | $14.9B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -59.79x | — | 636.02x | — | 6.72x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $114,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for CYN. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +41.7% total return vs RBOT's -94.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 73.3% vs CYN's -95.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.9% | -79.8% | +8.8% | -26.9% | -10.1% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.6% | -94.1% | +41.7% | -19.9% | -17.0% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.2% | +420.5% | +31.1% | +15.0% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | +1040.5% | +41.3% | +28.1% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | +17472.3% | +474.3% | +194.9% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.5% | -80.0% | +73.3% | +9.4% | +4.8% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RBOT's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs CYN's 3.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 2.42x | 1.81x | 0.89x | 0.39x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.54 | $13.75 | $236.54 | $603.88 | $404.87 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.22 | $0.35 | $140.85 | $396.68 | $281.00 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.0% | +3.7% | +86.7% | +68.1% | +77.1% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 36.5 | 44.9 | 41.2 | 48.2 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 277K | 14K | 147.4M | 2.2M | 2.3M | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVDA as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.8% upside for NVDA (target: $309) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs SYK's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $309.46 | $603.00 | $387.46 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 79 | 55 | 51 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | — | +1.1% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 2 | — | 16 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.04 | — | $3.36 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
CYN vs RBOT vs NVDA vs ISRG vs SYK vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 5% for Cyngn Inc. (CYN). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 52. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1041%, compared to -100.
0% for Cyngn Inc. (CYN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +174. 7% versus CYN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Vicarious Surgical Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning RBOT is approximately -1310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -40. 5% for Cyngn Inc. (CYN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cyngn Inc. grew EPS 76. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -107. 2% for Cyngn Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -117. 3% for CYN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 39. 6x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 50. 8% to $309. 46.
08Which pays a better dividend — CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), SYK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CYN, RBOT, NVDA, ISRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CYN or RBOT or NVDA or ISRG or SYK or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Cyngn Inc. (CYN) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CYN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CYN and RBOT and NVDA and ISRG and SYK and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CYN (Technology) and RBOT (Healthcare) and NVDA (Technology) and ISRG (Healthcare) and SYK (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CYN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SYK, JPM, KO pay a dividend while CYN, RBOT, NVDA, ISRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.