Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CYRX vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
CYRX vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $641M | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $183M | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $77M | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $231M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $5.89B |
CYRX vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) | 100 | 51.9 | -48.1% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CYRX vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CYRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs UPS's 44.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 2.17x
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.1x)
UPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- Rev growth -2.5%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.0%
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.5% revenue growth vs CYRX's -24.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.2% margin vs UPS's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs CYRX's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.4% vs UPS's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs UPS's 7.3%, ROIC -5.1% vs 16.1% |
CYRX vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CYRX vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CYRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 482.9x CYRX's $183M. CYRX is the more profitable business, keeping 42.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPS's 5.9%. On growth, CYRX holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $183M | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $77M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +42.2% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.7% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CYRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, CYRX trades at a 40% valuation discount to UPS's 15.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $641M | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $621M | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.11x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.64x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $16 for CYRX. CYRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPS scores 5/9 vs CYRX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $231M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.64x | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CYRX and UPS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UPS five years ago would be worth $5,997 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,024 for CYRX. Over the past 12 months, CYRX leads with a +125.4% total return vs UPS's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPS at -11.8% vs CYRX's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.5% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +125.4% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.5% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +557.7% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CYRX and UPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CYRX's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYRX currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs UPS's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.28 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.31 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.2 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CYRX as "Buy" and UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for UPS (target: $115) vs -2.0% for CYRX (target: $13). UPS is the only dividend payer here at 6.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.50 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +1.2% |
CYRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UPS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
CYRX vs UPS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CYRX or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger pick with -2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CYRX or UPS?
On trailing P/E, Cryoport, Inc.
(CYRX) is the cheapest at 9. 1x versus United Parcel Service, Inc. at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CYRX or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) delivered a total return of -40. 0%, compared to -79. 8% for Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYRX returned +557. 7% versus UPS's +44. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CYRX or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Cryoport, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CYRX is approximately 104% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CYRX or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is pulling ahead at -2. 5% versus -24. 5% for Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cryoport, Inc. grew EPS 163. 3% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for United Parcel Service, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UPS leads at -4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CYRX or UPS?
Cryoport, Inc.
(CYRX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus 6. 3% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPS leads at 9. 6% versus -20. 9% for CYRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYRX leads at 47. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CYRX or UPS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPS: 15.
1% to $115. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — CYRX or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CYRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CYRX or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, CYRX: +557. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CYRX and UPS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
UPS pays a dividend while CYRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.