Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CZNC vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CZNC vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $390M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $154M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 65.3% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $25M |
CZNC vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens & Northern… (CZNC) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CZNC vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CZNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 4.7%
- Rev growth -0.8%, EPS growth -13.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 56.5%, current ratio 1.11x
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 126.9% 10Y total return vs CZNC's 65.8%
- NIM 3.1% vs CZNC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs MNSB's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs CZNC's +19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZNC's 0.5% |
CZNC vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CZNC vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZNC and MNSB operate at a comparable scale, with $154M and $136M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.2% (CZNC) to 11.5% (MNSB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $154M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.3% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.8% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 10% valuation discount to CZNC's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CZNC's 18.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $390M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $537M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.92x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.71x | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.95x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.75x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.53x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.96x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CZNC and MNSB each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZNC delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZNC's 0.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $147M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $12,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,965 for CZNC. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +26.4% total return vs CZNC's +19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZNC at 12.3% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.9% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.5% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.8% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.3% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZNC and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs CZNC's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.11 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.02 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.5 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CZNC as "Hold" and MNSB as "Hold". CZNC is the only dividend payer here at 4.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
MNSB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CZNC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CZNC vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CZNC or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the stronger pick with -0.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CZNC or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Citizens & Northern Corporation at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Citizens & Northern Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CZNC or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to +9. 7% for Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus CZNC's +65. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CZNC or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 15% more volatile than CZNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 56% for Citizens & Northern Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CZNC or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is pulling ahead at -0.
8% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -13. 6% for Citizens & Northern Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CZNC or MNSB?
Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
2% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZNC leads at 18. 6% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CZNC leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CZNC or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CZNC or MNSB?
In this comparison, CZNC (4.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CZNC or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZNC: +65. 8%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CZNC and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CZNC pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.