Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
DAAQ logo
DAAQ
GLXY logo
GLXY
COIN logo
COIN
MSTR logo
MSTR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DAAQ
Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.-4.4%
GLXY
Galaxy Digital

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$129.84B
5Y Perf.+52.3%
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$42.10B
5Y Perf.-54.4%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$41.40B
5Y Perf.-69.3%

DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DAAQ logoDAAQ
GLXY logoGLXY
COIN logoCOIN
MSTR logoMSTR
IndustryShell CompaniesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$178M$129.84B$42.10B$41.40B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$61.08B$5.81B$490M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$40M$801M$-12.36B
Gross Margin1.9%75.9%68.1%
Operating Margin0.9%0.4%94.2%
Forward P/E27.9x227.9x2.5x
Total Debt$0.00$5.33B$7.83B$8.28B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$1.45B$11.29B$2.30B

DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DAAQ
GLXY
COIN
MSTR
StockJun 25Jun 26Return
Digital Asset Acqui… (DAAQ)10095.6-4.4%
Galaxy Digital (GLXY)100152.3+52.3%
Coinbase Global, In… (COIN)10045.6-54.4%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)10030.7-69.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSTR leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Galaxy Digital is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. DAAQ and COIN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇MSTR emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
DAAQ
Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick

DAAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 4.8% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.9%
Best for: efficiency
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
The Banking Pick

GLXY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth -184.1%
  • 40.2% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0%
  • +71.8% vs MSTR's -67.4%
Best for: growth exposure
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COIN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 13.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Best for: quality
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Income Pick

MSTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 1.0%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs GLXY's 46.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.85, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
  • Beta 2.85, yield 1.0%, current ratio 5.62x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLXY logoGLXY40.2% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0%
ValueMSTR logoMSTRLower P/E (2.5x vs 227.9x)
Quality / MarginsCOIN logoCOIN13.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Stability / SafetyMSTR logoMSTRBeta 2.85 vs GLXY's 3.99, lower leverage
DividendsMSTR logoMSTR1.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLXY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GLXY logoGLXY+71.8% vs MSTR's -67.4%
Efficiency (ROA)DAAQ logoDAAQ4.8% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.9%

DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Crypto Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Crypto Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
DAAQDigital Asset Acquisition Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GLXYGalaxy Digital

Segment breakdown not available.

COINCoinbase Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing, Consumer, Net
47.9%$3.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Stablecoin
19.5%$1.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Blockchain Infrastructure Service
9.8%$677M
Subscription and Circulation, Other
8.0%$555M
Bank Servicing, Institutional
6.9%$480M
Other Revenue
4.3%$298M
Bank Servicing, Other
3.6%$253M
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M

DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSTRLAGGINGCOIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

GLXY and DAAQ operate at a comparable scale, with $61.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$61.1B$5.8B$490M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$609M$248M$480M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$40M$801M-$12.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$55M$2.8B$7.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+1.9%+75.9%+68.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.9%+0.4%+94.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.1%+13.8%-25.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%+48.0%+15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.7%-7.2%-132.0%
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GLXY leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 27.9x trailing earnings, DAAQ trades at a 22% valuation discount to COIN's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COIN's 23.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLXY's 219.5x.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
Market CapShares × price$178M$129.8B$42.1B$41.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$177M$133.7B$38.6B$47.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.92x-62.94x35.91x-8.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.227.93x2.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.71x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple219.52x23.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.12x5.86x86.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x42.78x3.10x0.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.35x
GLXY leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

COIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

COIN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MSTR. MSTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLXY's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COIN scores 4/9 vs GLXY's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.0%+1.5%+5.7%-24.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.8%+0.4%+2.8%-19.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.3%+9.2%+5.7%-9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.4%+16.2%+8.1%-12.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93143
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.76x0.53x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$3.9B-$3.5B$6.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$1.4B$11.3B$2.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$5.3B$7.8B$8.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.71x11.92x9.05x
COIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $20,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,683 for COIN. Over the past 12 months, GLXY leads with a +71.8% total return vs MSTR's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 64.7% vs DAAQ's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.4%+34.8%-32.4%-21.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-10.0%+71.8%-33.7%-67.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.0%+46.3%+216.0%+346.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.0%+46.3%-33.2%+107.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.0%+46.3%-51.3%+565.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.5%+13.5%+46.7%+64.7%
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DAAQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DAAQ is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLXY's 3.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAAQ currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs MSTR's 27.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.12x3.99x3.21x2.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.70$45.92$444.65$457.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.10$16.43$139.36$104.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.3%+72.6%+35.9%+27.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.059.740.634.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded49K5.9M9.3M16.7M
DAAQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GLXY as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.0% upside for MSTR (target: $252) vs 0.9% for GLXY (target: $34). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalCOIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy Inc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.67$237.39$251.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts113829
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$1.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.9%0.0%
MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). GLXY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallStrategy Inc (MSTR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DAAQ vs GLXY vs COIN vs MSTR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is the stronger pick with 40.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. (DAAQ) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galaxy Digital (GLXY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

On trailing P/E, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

(DAAQ) is the cheapest at 27. 9x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +107.

1%, compared to -33. 2% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +565. 4% versus COIN's -51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

(DAAQ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Galaxy Digital's 3. 99β — meaning GLXY is approximately -3463% more volatile than DAAQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategy Inc (MSTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 176% for Galaxy Digital — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is pulling ahead at 40.

2% versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -184. 1% for Galaxy Digital. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

Coinbase Global, Inc.

(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.

5x forward P/E versus 227. 9x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 225. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 103. 0% to $251. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR?

In this comparison, MSTR (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. DAAQ, GLXY, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DAAQ or GLXY or COIN or MSTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

(DAAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12)). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAAQ: -10. 0%, COIN: -51. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DAAQ and GLXY and COIN and MSTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (DAAQ (Financial Services) and GLXY (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DAAQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLXY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while DAAQ, GLXY, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.