Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
DAAQ logo
DAAQ
GLXY logo
GLXY
KO logo
KO
COIN logo
COIN
MSTR logo
MSTR
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DAAQ
Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.-4.4%
GLXY
Galaxy Digital

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$129.84B
5Y Perf.+52.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+16.8%
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$42.10B
5Y Perf.-54.4%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$41.40B
5Y Perf.-69.3%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+10.6%

DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DAAQ logoDAAQ
GLXY logoGLXY
KO logoKO
COIN logoCOIN
MSTR logoMSTR
JPM logoJPM
IndustryShell CompaniesFinancial - Capital MarketsBeverages - Non-AlcoholicFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesSoftware - ApplicationBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$178M$129.84B$355.61B$42.10B$41.40B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$61.08B$49.28B$5.81B$490M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$40M$13.70B$801M$-12.36B$57.05B
Gross Margin1.9%61.7%75.9%68.1%60.0%
Operating Margin0.9%29.3%0.4%94.2%25.9%
Forward P/E27.9x25.3x227.9x2.5x14.4x
Total Debt$0.00$5.33B$45.49B$7.83B$8.28B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$1.45B$10.27B$11.29B$2.30B$343.34B

DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DAAQ
GLXY
KO
COIN
MSTR
JPM
StockJun 25Jun 26Return
Digital Asset Acqui… (DAAQ)10095.6-4.4%
Galaxy Digital (GLXY)100152.3+52.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100116.8+16.8%
Coinbase Global, In… (COIN)10045.6-54.4%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)10030.7-69.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100110.6+10.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Galaxy Digital is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
DAAQ
Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick

DAAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 2.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
Best for: bank quality
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
The Banking Pick

GLXY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth -184.1%
  • 40.2% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • +71.8% vs MSTR's -67.4%
Best for: growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.9%
Best for: quality and dividends
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 6 stocks, COIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Long-Run Compounder

MSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.85, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
  • Beta 2.85, yield 1.0%, current ratio 5.62x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • PEG 0.81 vs COIN's 4.53
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 227.9x), PEG 0.81 vs 4.53
  • Beta 0.94 vs GLXY's 3.99
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLXY logoGLXY40.2% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 227.9x), PEG 0.81 vs 4.53
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs GLXY's 3.99
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GLXY logoGLXY+71.8% vs MSTR's -67.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.9%

DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Crypto Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Crypto Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
DAAQDigital Asset Acquisition Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GLXYGalaxy Digital

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
COINCoinbase Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing, Consumer, Net
47.9%$3.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Stablecoin
19.5%$1.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Blockchain Infrastructure Service
9.8%$677M
Subscription and Circulation, Other
8.0%$555M
Bank Servicing, Institutional
6.9%$480M
Other Revenue
4.3%$298M
Bank Servicing, Other
3.6%$253M
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and DAAQ operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$61.1B$49.3B$5.8B$490M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$609M$15.5B$248M$480M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$40M$13.7B$801M-$12.4B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$55M$12.6B$2.8B$7.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+1.9%+61.7%+75.9%+68.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.9%+29.3%+0.4%+94.2%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.1%+27.8%+13.8%-25.2%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%+25.5%+48.0%+15.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+11.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.7%+18.2%-7.2%-132.0%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GLXY and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 55% valuation discount to COIN's 35.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COIN offers better value at 0.71x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$178M$129.8B$355.6B$42.1B$41.4B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$177M$133.7B$390.8B$38.6B$47.4B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.92x-62.94x27.18x35.91x-8.14x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x227.93x2.47x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x0.71x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple219.52x26.39x23.80x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.12x7.42x5.86x86.74x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x42.78x10.40x3.10x0.71x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x17.35x8.88x
Evenly matched — GLXY and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MSTR. MSTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs GLXY's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.0%+1.5%+41.1%+5.7%-24.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.8%+0.4%+13.1%+2.8%-19.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.3%+9.2%+15.8%+5.7%-9.9%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.4%+16.2%+17.3%+8.1%-12.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9317435
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.76x1.33x0.53x0.16x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$3.9B$35.2B-$3.5B$6.0B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$1.4B$10.3B$11.3B$2.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$5.3B$45.5B$7.8B$8.3B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.71x10.70x11.92x9.05x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,683 for COIN. Over the past 12 months, GLXY leads with a +71.8% total return vs MSTR's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 64.7% vs DAAQ's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.4%+34.8%+20.3%-32.4%-21.1%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-10.0%+71.8%+17.2%-33.7%-67.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.0%+46.3%+47.0%+216.0%+346.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.0%+46.3%+65.6%-33.2%+107.1%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.0%+46.3%+121.1%-51.3%+565.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.5%+13.5%+13.7%+46.7%+64.7%+33.6%
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLXY's 3.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs MSTR's 27.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.12x3.99x-0.20x3.21x2.85x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.70$45.92$84.04$444.65$457.22$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.10$16.43$65.35$139.36$104.17$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.3%+72.6%+98.3%+35.9%+27.1%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.059.760.640.634.359.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded49K5.9M12.7M9.3M16.7M7.0M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GLXY as "Buy", KO as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.0% upside for MSTR (target: $252) vs 0.9% for GLXY (target: $34). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs MSTR's 1.05%.

MetricDAAQ logoDAAQDigital Asset Acq…GLXY logoGLXYGalaxy DigitalKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.67$86.13$237.39$251.60$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1148382961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+2.5%+1.0%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises156115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$2.04$1.30$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%+1.9%0.0%+3.9%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DAAQ vs GLXY vs KO vs COIN vs MSTR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is the stronger pick with 40.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galaxy Digital (GLXY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. 's 4. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -33. 2% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +565. 4% versus COIN's -51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Galaxy Digital's 3. 99β — meaning GLXY is approximately -2094% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategy Inc (MSTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is pulling ahead at 40.

2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -184. 1% for Galaxy Digital. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. 's 4. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 227. 9x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 225. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 103. 0% to $251. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), MSTR (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. DAAQ, GLXY, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DAAQ or GLXY or KO or COIN or MSTR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, COIN: -51. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DAAQ and GLXY and KO and COIN and MSTR and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (DAAQ (Financial Services) and GLXY (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and COIN (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DAAQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLXY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, MSTR, JPM pay a dividend while DAAQ, GLXY, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.