Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency |
| Market Cap | $178M | $5.37B | $10.09B | $4.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $868M | $653M | $740M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-2.04B | $-867M | $-501M |
| Gross Margin | — | 0.3% | -13.6% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.9% | -125.0% | -24.5% |
| Forward P/E | 27.9x | — | — | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3.65B | $280M | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $547M | $234M | $43M |
DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Asset Acqui… (DAAQ) | 100 | 95.6 | -4.4% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 235.5 | +135.5% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 149.4 | +49.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAAQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and bank quality is your priority.
- -10.0% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.3%
- NIM 2.6% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 2.6% margin vs MARA's -234.8%
- 4.8% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.0%
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.32, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 3.32, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 3.32 vs RIOT's 4.14
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 4.14
- +160.6% vs MARA's -11.0%
CLSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs MARA's -234.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.32 vs RIOT's 4.14 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.6% vs MARA's -11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.0% |
DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAAQ leads in 1 of 6 categories
RIOT leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • CLSK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MARA and CLSK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA and DAAQ operate at a comparable scale, with $868M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -67.7% (CLSK) to -2.3% (MARA).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $868M | $653M | $740M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $953M | -$450M | $244M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$2.0B | -$867M | -$501M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$385M | -$1.0B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +0.3% | -13.6% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +16.9% | -125.0% | -24.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.3% | -132.8% | -67.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -44.4% | -156.7% | -144.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -24.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -113.5% | -60.0% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DAAQ and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 47% valuation discount to DAAQ's 27.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $5.4B | $10.1B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $177M | $8.5B | $10.1B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.92x | -3.82x | -13.65x | 14.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.92x | 15.58x | 5.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.44x | 3.17x | 2.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAAQ leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAAQ delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-52 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | -51.7% | -28.8% | -29.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | -28.0% | -21.5% | -16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -9.0% | -8.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | -12.1% | -11.0% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.05x | 0.10x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $3.1B | $46M | $781M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $547M | $234M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3.6B | $280M | $824M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 12.66x | -16.47x | -15.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAAQ five years ago would be worth $8,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,703 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +160.6% total return vs MARA's -11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 63.7% vs DAAQ's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +42.1% | +87.9% | +42.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.0% | -11.0% | +160.6% | +69.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +50.9% | +159.9% | +338.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | -53.0% | -24.8% | -15.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | -66.0% | +734.1% | -82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +14.7% | +37.5% | +63.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAAQ and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAAQ is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 4.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs MARA's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.12x | 3.32x | 4.14x | 3.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.70 | $23.45 | $28.94 | $23.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $6.66 | $8.87 | $8.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +60.0% | +91.9% | +69.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 53.5 | 56.8 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 41.5M | 17.9M | 21.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CLSK (target: $19) vs -11.2% for MARA (target: $13). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.50 | $27.25 | $18.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 18 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.0% | +3.4% |
DAAQ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). RIOT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DAAQ vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. at 27. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
Over the past 5 years, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) delivered a total return of -10. 0%, compared to -53. 0% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +734. 1% versus CLSK's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 4. 14β — meaning RIOT is approximately -3584% more volatile than DAAQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DAAQ, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is DAAQ or MARA or RIOT or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAAQ: -10. 0%, CLSK: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DAAQ and MARA and RIOT and CLSK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAAQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.