Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DAC vs SBLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
DAC vs SBLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $2.42B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $84M |
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 47.8% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.16B | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $500M |
DAC vs SBLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danaos Corporation (DAC) | 100 | 3280.4 | +3180.4% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 526.7 | +426.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAC vs SBLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 2.8%, EPS growth 2.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 3.28x
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs DAC's 225.9%
- +83.1% vs DAC's +68.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.8% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 8.0x), PEG 0.11 vs 0.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 47.4% margin vs SBLK's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs SBLK's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.1% vs DAC's +68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs 3.2% |
DAC vs SBLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK and DAC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $1.0B in trailing revenue. DAC is the more profitable business, keeping 47.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBLK's 8.1%. On growth, DAC holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $695M | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $341M | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +47.4% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DAC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, DAC trades at a 87% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DAC offers better value at 0.11x vs SBLK's 0.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.94x | 36.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.26x | 8.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.11x | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.59x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.51x | 14.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAC delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. DAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBLK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs DAC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $118M | $572M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $500M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.62x | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DAC and SBLK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAC five years ago would be worth $22,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,911 for SBLK. Over the past 12 months, SBLK leads with a +83.1% total return vs DAC's +68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAC at 35.7% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.7% | +40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.0% | +83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | +60.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.8% | +79.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.9% | +977.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
DAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBLK's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $132.70 | $27.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.29 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.6 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 83K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
DAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DAC as "Hold" and SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -20.6% for DAC (target: $105). For income investors, DAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.60% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $105.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.44 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +3.2% |
DAC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
DAC vs SBLK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAC or SBLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the stronger pick with 2.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Danaos Corporation (DAC) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (5. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAC or SBLK?
On trailing P/E, Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Danaos Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Danaos Corporation wins at 0. 11x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 's 0. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAC or SBLK?
Over the past 5 years, Danaos Corporation (DAC) delivered a total return of +124.
8%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus DAC's +225. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAC or SBLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 's 0. 73β — meaning SBLK is approximately 18% more volatile than DAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Danaos Corporation (DAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 44% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAC or SBLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Danaos Corporation (DAC) is pulling ahead at 2.
8% versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Danaos Corporation grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAC leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAC or SBLK?
Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the more profitable company, earning 47.
4% net margin versus 8. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — meaning it keeps 47. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DAC leads at 47. 8% versus 13. 5% for SBLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAC leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAC or SBLK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 's 0. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Danaos Corporation (DAC) trades at 5. 3x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAC or SBLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Danaos Corporation (DAC) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is DAC or SBLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, DAC: +225. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAC and SBLK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.