Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
Consumer Electronics
DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $975M | $760M | $4.37B | $63.74B | $232M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $803M | $592M | $627M | $2.49B | $5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $26M | $214M | $440M | $-32.28B |
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | 25.3% | 73.5% | 37.7% | -0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.5% | 35.6% | 9.5% | -5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 22.3x | 19.4x | 114.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $17M | $67M | $43M | $2.61B | $1.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $3M | $138M | $521M | $21.15B |
DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 471.9 | +371.9% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| Universal Display C… (OLED) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1217.7 | +1117.7% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 114.9 | +14.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, DAKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LYTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.31 vs OLED's 1.54
- Better valuation composite
OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
- Beta 1.39, yield 1.9%, current ratio 10.06x
- 34.1% margin vs VUZI's -5.1%
LITE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs DAKT's 156.0%
- +12.5% vs OLED's -34.0%
VUZI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.1% margin vs VUZI's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs VUZI's 3.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs VUZI's 10.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs OLED's -34.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 11.7% vs -10.7% |
DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OLED leads in 2 of 6 categories
LITE leads 1 • DAKT leads 0 • LYTS leads 0 • VUZI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 462.2x VUZI's $5M. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VUZI's -5.1%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $803M | $592M | $627M | $2.5B | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $65M | $51M | $259M | $425M | -$30.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $26M | $214M | $440M | -$32.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | $38M | $237M | $399M | -$20.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +25.3% | +73.5% | +37.7% | -0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +6.5% | +35.6% | +9.5% | -5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +4.3% | +34.1% | +17.7% | -5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +6.4% | +37.8% | +16.0% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -0.5% | -14.5% | +90.1% | +4933.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.0% | +11.1% | -43.7% | +3.3% | +25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OLED leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, OLED trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OLED offers better value at 1.44x vs LYTS's 1.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $760M | $4.4B | $63.7B | $232M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $865M | $823M | $4.3B | $65.8B | -$19.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -95.29x | 30.91x | 18.26x | 2412.94x | -6.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.52x | 22.34x | 19.43x | 114.43x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.82x | 1.44x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.42x | 17.03x | 14.37x | 859.43x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 1.33x | 6.71x | 38.75x | 0.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.50x | 3.26x | 2.51x | 54.76x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.47x | 21.94x | 28.30x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DAKT and OLED each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. OLED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +10.9% | +12.3% | +30.7% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +6.5% | +11.0% | +8.5% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | +9.5% | +11.7% | -4.3% | -10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +12.6% | +14.0% | -4.8% | -184.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.29x | 0.02x | 2.30x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$111M | $63M | -$95M | $2.1B | -$20.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $3M | $138M | $521M | $21.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $67M | $43M | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | 13.52x | — | 9.62x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,520 for VUZI. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs OLED's -34.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs OLED's -11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +32.8% | -23.5% | +131.2% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +58.0% | -34.0% | +1247.8% | +63.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.1% | +100.0% | -29.9% | +1764.2% | -29.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.3% | +223.4% | -54.9% | +976.6% | -84.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.0% | +108.5% | +86.6% | +3635.5% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.8% | +26.0% | -11.1% | +165.2% | -11.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYTS and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs OLED's 56.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.43x | 1.39x | 2.69x | 3.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.27 | $24.75 | $163.21 | $1021.00 | $4.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.05 | $15.31 | $83.64 | $60.38 | $1.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +98.7% | +56.8% | +87.4% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 70.1 | 46.7 | 58.8 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 378K | 817K | 6.4M | 924K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OLED and VUZI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy", OLED as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.8% upside for VUZI (target: $6) vs -28.0% for LITE (target: $643). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 10.10% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $141.00 | $643.18 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 | 19 | 24 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +1.9% | — | +10.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | $1.80 | — | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
OLED leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LITE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DAKT vs LYTS vs OLED vs LITE vs VUZI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7.
5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI?
On trailing P/E, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LSI Industries Inc. wins at 1. 31x versus Universal Display Corporation's 1. 54x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -84. 8% for Vuzix Corporation (VUZI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus VUZI's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
39β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning VUZI is approximately 145% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -7.
5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI?
Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
2% net margin versus -513. 9% for Vuzix Corporation — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -517. 6% for VUZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 31x versus Universal Display Corporation's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 95. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VUZI: 109. 8% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield), OLED (1. 9% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. DAKT, LITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAKT or LYTS or OLED or LITE or VUZI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
9% yield). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +86. 6%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAKT and LYTS and OLED and LITE and VUZI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock. LYTS, OLED, VUZI pay a dividend while DAKT, LITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.