Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $975M | $232M | $189M | $760M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $803M | $5M | $1M | $592M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $-32.28B | $-95M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | -0.0% | -14.4% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -5.2% | -57.4% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | — | — | 22.3x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $1.00B | $37M | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $21.15B | $32M | $3M |
DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 471.9 | +371.9% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 114.9 | +14.9% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 70.0 | -30.0% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 156.0% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 108.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 2.22x
- Lower P/E (21.5x vs 22.3x)
VUZI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.40, yield 10.1%
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Beta 3.40, yield 10.1%, current ratio 5.56x
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
MVIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LYTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 4.3% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
- Beta 1.43 vs VUZI's 3.40
- 6.5% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.5x vs 22.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs MVIS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs VUZI's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.4% vs MVIS's -45.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -10.7% |
DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAKT leads in 3 of 6 categories
LYTS leads 2 • VUZI leads 1 • MVIS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 664.4x MVIS's $1M. LYTS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $803M | $5M | $1M | $592M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $65M | -$30.9B | -$64M | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | -$32.3B | -$95M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | -$20.8B | -$59M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | -0.0% | -14.4% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -5.2% | -57.4% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -5.1% | -78.6% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -3.3% | -49.2% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +4933.1% | -86.5% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.0% | +25.0% | +14.3% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DAKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DAKT's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYTS's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $232M | $189M | $760M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $865M | -$19.9B | $193M | $823M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -95.29x | -6.81x | -1.76x | 30.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.52x | — | — | 22.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.42x | — | — | 17.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 0.04x | 156.30x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.50x | 0.01x | 3.03x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.47x | — | — | 21.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. VUZI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVIS's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LYTS scores 5/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | -5.2% | -137.4% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | -3.2% | -74.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | -10.7% | -98.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | -184.6% | -93.6% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.04x | 0.66x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$111M | -$20.1B | $4M | $63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $21.2B | $32M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $1.0B | $37M | $67M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | — | -3.54x | 13.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $437 for MVIS. Over the past 12 months, VUZI leads with a +63.4% total return vs MVIS's -45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 57.8% vs MVIS's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | -25.7% | -30.8% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +63.4% | -45.5% | +58.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.1% | -29.6% | -73.6% | +100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.3% | -84.8% | -95.6% | +223.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.0% | -35.7% | -66.2% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.8% | -11.0% | -35.8% | +26.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LYTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs MVIS's 35.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 3.40x | 2.61x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.27 | $4.29 | $1.73 | $24.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.05 | $1.71 | $0.51 | $15.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +66.7% | +35.6% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 61.1 | 50.3 | 70.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 924K | 5.3M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
VUZI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs 10.6% for LYTS (target: $27). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 10.10% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $5.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.1% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | — | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAKT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LYTS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
DAKT vs VUZI vs MVIS vs LYTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS?
On forward P/E, Daktronics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +223. 4%, compared to -95. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +156. 0% versus MVIS's -66. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning VUZI is approximately 138% more volatile than LYTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for MicroVision, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vuzix Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS?
LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYTS leads at 6. 2% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAKT leads at 25. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Daktronics, Inc.
(DAKT) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for LSI Industries Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 711. 7% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. DAKT, MVIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAKT or VUZI or MVIS or LYTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +108. 5% 10Y return). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYTS: +108. 5%, MVIS: -66. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAKT and VUZI and MVIS and LYTS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock. VUZI, LYTS pay a dividend while DAKT, MVIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.