Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DAO vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
DAO vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $375M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.89B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $10.73B |
DAO vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Youdao, Inc. (DAO) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAO vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 44.7x)
- +35.6% vs WMT's +32.7%
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs DAO's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs DAO's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs DAO's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs DAO's 0.78 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs WMT's +32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs DAO's 5.4% |
DAO vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAO vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 119.3x DAO's $5.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (WMT) to 1.8% (DAO). On growth, DAO holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DAO leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DAO's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $375M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $579M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.25x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.74x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs DAO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.90x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,249 for DAO. Over the past 12 months, DAO leads with a +35.6% total return vs WMT's +32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs DAO's 21.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.6% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.1% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.5% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAO's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DAO's 92.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DAO as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.3% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs -45.8% for DAO (target: $7). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DAO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
DAO vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAO or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Youdao, Inc. (DAO). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 47. 7x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Youdao, Inc. (DAO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAO or WMT?
On forward P/E, Youdao, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAO or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -47. 5% for Youdao, Inc. (DAO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus DAO's -4. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAO or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Youdao, Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning DAO is approximately 567% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — DAO or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 3. 6% for Youdao, Inc. (DAO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Youdao, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAO or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 1. 8% for Youdao, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus 3. 7% for DAO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAO leads at 44. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAO or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 36. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 3% to $137. 04.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAO or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. DAO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAO or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, DAO: -4. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAO and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while DAO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.