Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Banks - Regional
Regulated Water
DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Banks - Regional | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $9.91B | $4.21B | $4.41B | $2.64B | $24.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.75B | $1.46B | $2.18B | $1.12B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $379M | $207M | $150M | $224M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 37.6% | 35.2% | 71.0% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 19.4% | 12.6% | 25.5% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.6x | 18.6x | 21.8x | 11.5x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $730M | $452M | $280M | $1.12B | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $180M | $432M | $100M | $668M | $119M |
DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donaldson Company, … (DCI) | 100 | 181.0 | +81.0% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 12.4% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 21.7% vs 7.1%
MWA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 179.4% 10Y total return vs FELE's 231.4%
- PEG 0.84 vs AWK's 2.63
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92 vs MWA's 1.02, lower leverage
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs DCI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 20.7x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.63
- +32.5% vs AWK's -12.5%
AWK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 5.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.7%
- 21.2% margin vs FELE's 6.9%
- 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DCI's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs DCI's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 20.7x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.2% margin vs FELE's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs MWA's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DCI's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs AWK's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 21.7% vs 7.1% |
DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 2 of 6 categories
DCI leads 1 • MWA leads 0 • FELE leads 0 • AWK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRMK and AWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 4.6x TRMK's $1.1B. AWK is the more profitable business, keeping 21.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FELE's 6.9%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.8B | $1.5B | $2.2B | $1.1B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $599M | $333M | $322M | $323M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $379M | $207M | $150M | $224M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $350M | $171M | $169M | $230M | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +37.6% | +35.2% | +71.0% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +19.4% | +12.6% | +25.5% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +14.2% | +6.9% | +20.0% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +11.7% | +7.8% | +20.7% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +5.5% | +9.9% | — | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.3% | +15.2% | +13.4% | +5.4% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 61% valuation discount to FELE's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MWA offers better value at 1.00x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.9B | $4.2B | $4.4B | $2.6B | $24.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $4.2B | $4.6B | $3.1B | $40.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.16x | 22.04x | 30.75x | 12.13x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.59x | 18.65x | 21.77x | 11.50x | 20.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.20x | 1.00x | 3.53x | 1.50x | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.92x | 14.07x | 13.82x | 9.49x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.68x | 2.94x | 2.07x | 2.36x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.11x | 4.31x | 3.41x | 1.28x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.14x | 24.45x | 22.81x | 11.39x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DCI delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $10 for AWK. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs AWK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.0% | +20.7% | +11.4% | +10.8% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.4% | +11.4% | +7.6% | +1.2% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.7% | +19.7% | +14.7% | +7.1% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.6% | +17.8% | +18.1% | +3.2% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.46x | 0.21x | 0.53x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $550M | $20M | $181M | $448M | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $180M | $432M | $100M | $668M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $730M | $452M | $280M | $1.1B | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.94x | 22.98x | 24.75x | 0.75x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MWA five years ago would be worth $18,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,192 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs AWK's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs AWK's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | +12.6% | +3.6% | +15.5% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.6% | +14.9% | +17.7% | +32.5% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | +88.7% | +10.0% | +118.5% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | +89.1% | +20.3% | +47.6% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.5% | +179.4% | +231.4% | +127.7% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.7% | +23.6% | +3.2% | +29.8% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MWA's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs DCI's 76.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.02x | 0.92x | 0.94x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.84 | $31.00 | $111.53 | $45.99 | $150.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.72 | $22.74 | $83.42 | $33.39 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +86.7% | +89.6% | +97.6% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 41.2 | 54.8 | 56.0 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 639K | 1.0M | 281K | 392K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DCI and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCI as "Hold", MWA as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for MWA (target: $33) vs 0.1% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, AWK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.57% vs MWA's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.20 | $33.33 | $100.00 | $45.50 | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 21 | 11 | 9 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +2.2% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 36 | 12 | 32 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $0.27 | $1.11 | $0.97 | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.4% | +3.8% | +3.0% | 0.0% |
TRMK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). DCI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
DCI vs MWA vs FELE vs TRMK vs AWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Water Products, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) delivered a total return of +89. 1%, compared to -8. 1% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FELE returned +231. 4% versus AWK's +100. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Mueller Water Products, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning MWA is approximately -312% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 2. 9% for Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Water Products, Inc. grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 8% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWK leads at 10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK?
American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 6. 9% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 23. 9% to $33. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 0% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA).
09Is DCI or MWA or FELE or TRMK or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, MWA: +179. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCI and MWA and FELE and TRMK and AWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (DCI (Industrials) and MWA (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services) and AWK (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.