Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $399M | $159.85B | $109.33B | $2.04B | $97.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65M | $10.58B | $25.12B | $674M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $561K | $2.98B | $3.25B | $-173M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 118.8% | 66.3% | 63.5% | 75.2% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 30.5% | 22.4% | -27.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 169.8x | 43.3x | 19.1x | — | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $936K | $303M | $14.86B | $290M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $3.37B | $4.01B | $103M | $2.22B |
DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delcath Systems, In… (DCTH) | 100 | 147.0 | +47.0% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 129.1%, EPS growth 107.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 215.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 10.92x
- 129.1% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
ISRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SYK's 179.2%
- 28.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
SYK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.28 vs MDT's 35.17
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +2.6% vs SYK's -24.5%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 3.7%
- Beta 0.42, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.85x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.42 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 129.1% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs SYK's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.6% vs SYK's -24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -16.4% |
DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories
MDT leads 2 • DCTH leads 0 • SYK leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 542.2x DCTH's $65M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65M | $10.6B | $25.1B | $674M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $3.8B | $6.3B | -$165M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $561,000 | $3.0B | $3.2B | -$173M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $2.8B | $4.3B | -$48M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +118.8% | +66.3% | +63.5% | +75.2% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +30.5% | +22.4% | -27.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +28.2% | +12.9% | -25.7% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +26.8% | +17.1% | -7.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +23.0% | +11.4% | +12.3% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +18.8% | +56.0% | -100.0% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 88% valuation discount to DCTH's 169.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.29x vs MDT's 35.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $399M | $159.8B | $109.3B | $2.0B | $97.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $356M | $156.8B | $120.2B | $2.2B | $123.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 169.82x | 57.19x | 33.98x | -14.66x | 21.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.35x | 19.06x | — | 13.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.63x | 2.29x | — | 35.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 353.19x | 43.28x | 19.76x | — | 14.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.68x | 15.88x | 4.35x | 3.11x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.12x | 9.10x | 4.87x | 5.86x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.02x | 64.18x | 25.53x | — | 18.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. DCTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCTH scores 7/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | +16.9% | +15.0% | -50.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +14.8% | +6.9% | -16.5% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +15.0% | +11.4% | -16.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | +16.5% | +13.0% | -28.9% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x | 0.66x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$43M | -$3.1B | $10.8B | $187M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $3.4B | $4.0B | $103M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $936,000 | $303M | $14.9B | $290M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 6.72x | -96.80x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DCTH and ISRG and NVCR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $16,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +2.6% total return vs SYK's -24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCTH at 23.5% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | -19.9% | -17.8% | +36.4% | -20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.1% | -16.4% | -24.5% | +2.6% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +48.5% | +2.4% | -74.2% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +61.7% | +17.5% | -90.2% | -29.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +549.2% | +179.2% | +38.5% | +24.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | +14.1% | +0.8% | -36.4% | -2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs DCTH's 63.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.00x | 0.52x | 2.15x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.23 | $603.88 | $404.87 | $20.06 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.12 | $427.84 | $284.97 | $9.82 | $75.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.0% | +74.5% | +70.5% | +89.2% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 43.6 | 26.6 | 70.9 | 29.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 354K | 1.8M | 2.1M | 1.4M | 7.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCTH as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 100.3% upside for DCTH (target: $23) vs 36.5% for SYK (target: $390). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.65% vs SYK's 1.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $622.60 | $389.62 | $33.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 55 | 50 | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 34 | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.36 | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.3% |
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
DCTH vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Delcath Systems, Inc.
(DCTH) is the stronger pick with 129. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Delcath Systems, Inc. (DCTH) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
1x versus Delcath Systems, Inc. at 169. 8x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 28x versus Medtronic plc's 35. 17x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +61. 7%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus DCTH's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Delcath Systems, Inc. (DCTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Delcath Systems, Inc.
(DCTH) is pulling ahead at 129. 1% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delcath Systems, Inc. grew EPS 107. 3% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Stryker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DCTH leads at 215. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DCTH leads at 86. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus Medtronic plc's 35. 17x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 43. 3x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DCTH: 100. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
7% yield), SYK (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DCTH, ISRG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DCTH or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 1. 2% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCTH and ISRG and SYK and NVCR and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DCTH is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SYK, MDT pay a dividend while DCTH, ISRG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.