Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DEO
Diageo plc

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • GB
Market Cap$46.38B
5Y Perf.-40.7%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.05B
5Y Perf.-13.0%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • BE
Market Cap$138.11B
5Y Perf.+71.2%
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.10B
5Y Perf.+13.6%
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-64.1%

DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DEO logoDEO
STZ logoSTZ
BUD logoBUD
TAP logoTAP
SAM logoSAM
IndustryBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Alcoholic
Market Cap$46.38B$26.05B$138.11B$8.10B$2.18B
Revenue (TTM)$37.37B$9.38B$119.82B$11.19B$2.09B
Net Income (TTM)$5.49B$1.11B$12.57B$-2.11B$-61M
Gross Margin60.0%52.0%55.2%37.8%45.2%
Operating Margin27.9%34.5%31.7%-20.3%-3.8%
Forward P/E17.8x12.7x18.8x9.2x20.6x
Total Debt$24.40B$12.11B$72.17B$6.30B$38M
Cash & Equiv.$2.20B$68M$11.17B$897M$223M

DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DEO
STZ
BUD
TAP
SAM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Diageo plc (DEO)10059.3-40.7%
Constellation Brand… (STZ)10087.0-13.0%
Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD)100171.2+71.2%
Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP)100113.6+13.6%
The Boston Beer Com… (SAM)10035.9-64.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DEO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Constellation Brands, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. BUD, TAP, and SAM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DEO
Diageo plc
The Income Pick

DEO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 4.9%
  • 14.7% margin vs TAP's -18.9%
  • 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • 14.7% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 9.6% vs -10.1%
Best for: income & stability
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

STZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 12.6% 10Y total return vs SAM's 32.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.26, current ratio 0.92x
  • Beta 0.26, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.92x
  • Beta 0.26 vs DEO's 0.37, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
The Momentum Pick

BUD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +24.5% vs DEO's -25.1%
Best for: momentum
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
The Value Play

TAP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 20.6x)
Best for: value
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
  • 3.7% revenue growth vs TAP's -4.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAM logoSAM3.7% revenue growth vs TAP's -4.2%
ValueTAP logoTAPLower P/E (9.2x vs 20.6x)
Quality / MarginsDEO logoDEO14.7% margin vs TAP's -18.9%
Stability / SafetySTZ logoSTZBeta 0.26 vs DEO's 0.37, lower leverage
DividendsDEO logoDEO4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BUD logoBUD+24.5% vs DEO's -25.1%
Efficiency (ROA)DEO logoDEO14.7% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 9.6% vs -10.1%

DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DEODiageo plc
FY 2025
Spirits
79.3%$22.2B
Beer
16.1%$4.5B
Ready To Drink
3.5%$989M
Other Product
1.1%$316M
STZConstellation Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Beer
83.7%$8.5B
ConstellationWinesAndSpirits
16.3%$1.7B
BUDAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
FY 2020
transportation services, lease agreements and advertising services
100.0%$13M
TAPMolson Coors Beverage Company

Segment breakdown not available.

SAMThe Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDEOLAGGINGSTZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — DEO and TAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BUD is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.8B annually — 57.2x SAM's $2.1B. DEO is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAP's -18.9%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$37.4B$9.4B$119.8B$11.2B$2.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$11.6B$3.7B$38.8B-$1.5B$14M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5.5B$1.1B$12.6B-$2.1B-$61M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7.7B$1.8B$32.2B$1.2B$191M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.0%+52.0%+55.2%+37.8%+45.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.9%+34.5%+31.7%-20.3%-3.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.7%+11.8%+10.5%-18.9%-2.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.6%+18.8%+26.9%+10.4%+9.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-29.1%-9.8%+0.4%+2.0%+1.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.1%-15.0%+32.3%+35.6%-7.4%
Evenly matched — DEO and TAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TAP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.7x trailing earnings, DEO trades at a 30% valuation discount to BUD's 28.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEO's 11.3x.

MetricDEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
Market CapShares × price$46.4B$26.1B$138.1B$8.1B$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$68.6B$38.1B$199.1B$13.5B$2.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.68x-333.89x28.06x-3.98x20.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.82x12.70x18.81x9.17x20.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.33x9.37x9.47x8.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.29x2.55x2.31x0.73x1.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.53x3.82x1.85x0.80x2.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.27x13.44x12.34x7.58x10.09x
TAP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

DEO delivers a 54.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TAP. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DEO's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs TAP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+54.0%+13.9%+13.8%-18.6%-7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.7%+5.1%+6.0%-8.9%-5.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.6%+13.0%+7.5%-10.1%+15.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.7%+18.0%+8.7%-11.6%+14.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.85x1.70x0.81x0.60x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$22.2B$12.0B$61.0B$5.4B-$186M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.2B$68M$11.2B$897M$223M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24.4B$12.1B$72.2B$6.3B$38M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.71x5.47x2.53x-9.99x
SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BUD five years ago would be worth $11,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,818 for SAM. Over the past 12 months, BUD leads with a +24.5% total return vs DEO's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUD at 8.4% vs DEO's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.3%+7.9%+26.0%-8.0%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.1%-18.7%+24.5%-20.8%-15.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.3%-29.0%+27.5%-24.8%-35.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.9%-30.1%+12.4%-14.1%-81.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.0%+12.6%-24.5%-41.4%+32.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.3%-10.8%+8.4%-9.1%-13.4%
BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BUD and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TAP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DEO's 0.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs DEO's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.37x0.26x0.28x-0.01x0.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$116.69$196.91$82.91$57.57$264.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$72.46$126.45$56.97$40.64$185.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.5%+76.3%+96.8%+74.9%+76.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.545.970.747.228.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M1.8M2.0M2.9M199K
Evenly matched — BUD and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DEO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DEO as "Hold", STZ as "Buy", BUD as "Buy", TAP as "Hold", SAM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for DEO (target: $124) vs 10.9% for BUD (target: $89). For income investors, DEO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.95% vs BUD's 1.63%.

MetricDEO logoDEODiageo plcSTZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$124.00$175.70$89.00$48.30$246.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts3546453731
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.9%+2.7%+1.6%+4.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises124050
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.13$4.03$1.31$1.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.3%+0.7%+8.0%+9.4%
DEO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TAP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SAM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallDiageo plc (DEO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DEO vs STZ vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Diageo plc (DEO) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM?

On trailing P/E, Diageo plc (DEO) is the cheapest at 19.

7x versus Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM?

Over the past 5 years, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) delivered a total return of +12.

4%, compared to -81. 8% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +32. 0% versus TAP's -41. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

01β versus Diageo plc's 0. 37β — meaning DEO is approximately -3130% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 185% for Diageo plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -4. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEO leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM?

Diageo plc (DEO) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

6% net margin versus -19. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DEO leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 9.

2x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DEO: 48. 6% to $124. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM?

In this comparison, DEO (4.

9% yield), TAP (4. 5% yield), STZ (2. 7% yield), BUD (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DEO or STZ or BUD or TAP or SAM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

01), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -41. 4%, SAM: +32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DEO and STZ and BUD and TAP and SAM?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DEO is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DEO, STZ, BUD, TAP pay a dividend while SAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DEO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BUD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DEO and STZ and BUD and TAP and SAM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DEO: -29.1% · STZ: -9.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(DEO: 14.7% · STZ: 11.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.