Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Household & Personal Products | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $102M | $118M | $1.61B | $1.92B | $11.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $296M | $4.18B | $674M | $2.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-6M | $-1.82B | $-173M | $303M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 64.9% | 34.2% | 75.2% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | -12.2% | -3.6% | -4.1% | -27.2% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 69.0x | — | 5.6x | — | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $379M | $3.97B | $290M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $233M | $532M | $103M | $716M |
DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 63.2 | -36.8% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| Insulet Corporation (PODD) | 100 | 55.6 | -44.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DERM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SKIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 25.2x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
NVCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +1.1% vs PRGO's -51.2%
PODD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.68
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth -39.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 439.0% 10Y total return vs DERM's -47.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 69.4%, current ratio 2.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 25.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 20.1% vs 3.7% |
DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PODD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • DERM leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 74.1x DERM's $56M. PODD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, PODD holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $296M | $4.2B | $674M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $9M | $58M | -$165M | $582M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$6M | -$1.8B | -$173M | $303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $29M | $108M | -$48M | $416M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +64.9% | +34.2% | +75.2% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | -3.6% | -4.1% | -27.2% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.5% | -2.0% | -43.5% | -25.7% | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +9.8% | +2.6% | -7.1% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | -6.7% | -7.2% | +12.3% | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +38.0% | -56.4% | -100.0% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $118M | $1.6B | $1.9B | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $108M | $264M | $5.1B | $2.1B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.94x | -5.69x | -1.14x | -13.80x | 46.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 68.97x | — | 5.56x | — | 25.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7331.15x | 7.42x | — | 19.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.82x | 0.39x | 0.38x | 2.92x | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.09x | 2.02x | 0.55x | 5.51x | 7.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.17x | 11.12x | — | 29.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. PODD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.4% | -9.4% | -50.7% | -50.8% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | -1.2% | -19.8% | -16.5% | +9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -56.8% | -6.8% | +3.7% | -16.4% | +20.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.2% | -4.5% | +4.3% | -28.9% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 6.20x | 1.35x | 0.85x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $146M | $3.4B | $187M | $335M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $233M | $532M | $103M | $716M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $379M | $4.0B | $290M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.52x | 0.81x | -7.20x | -96.80x | 7.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DERM and NVCR and PODD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PODD five years ago would be worth $6,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 44.7% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | -35.0% | -13.5% | +28.3% | -43.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.1% | -35.9% | -51.2% | +1.1% | -39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.0% | -91.7% | -58.1% | -75.7% | -49.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.4% | -92.9% | -60.1% | -91.3% | -31.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.4% | -91.6% | -77.7% | +30.3% | +439.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.7% | -56.4% | -25.2% | -37.6% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PODD is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 2.00x | 1.18x | 2.20x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.55 | $2.69 | $28.44 | $20.06 | $354.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.31 | $0.76 | $9.23 | $9.82 | $148.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.3% | +33.8% | +41.2% | +83.9% | +45.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 52.1 | 60.9 | 69.8 | 22.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 230K | 760K | 3.4M | 1.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DERM as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold", PRGO as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", PODD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 42.9% for SKIN (target: $1). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.75 | $1.30 | $20.00 | $33.50 | $339.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 36 | 15 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +9.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 10 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
PODD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs NVCR vs PODD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger pick with 30.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Insulet Corporation (PODD) offers the better valuation at 46. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD?
Over the past 5 years, Insulet Corporation (PODD) delivered a total return of -31.
5%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PODD returned +439. 0% versus SKIN's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 222% more volatile than PODD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insulet Corporation (PODD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is pulling ahead at 30.
7% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PODD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD?
Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PODD leads at 17. 5% versus -24. 4% for DERM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. DERM, SKIN, NVCR, PODD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DERM or SKIN or PRGO or NVCR or PODD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), +439. 0% 10Y return). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DERM and SKIN and PRGO and NVCR and PODD?
These companies operate in different sectors (DERM (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and PRGO (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and PODD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PRGO pays a dividend while DERM, SKIN, NVCR, PODD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.