Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DFIN vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
DFIN vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $767M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 63.4% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.8% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $182M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $668M |
DFIN vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donnelley Financial… (DFIN) | 100 | 542.8 | +442.8% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFIN vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 47.9%, current ratio 1.06x
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs DFIN's 90.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs DFIN's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs DFIN's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs DFIN's -15.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% |
DFIN vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DFIN vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK and DFIN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $767M in trailing revenue. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DFIN's 4.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $767M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $217M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $140M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.4% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.0% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
DFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 68% valuation discount to DFIN's 38.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DFIN's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRMK's 9.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.47x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.43x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.25x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for DFIN. DFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.9% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.6% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $157M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $182M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.86x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DFIN five years ago would be worth $16,588 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,756 for TRMK. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs DFIN's -15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs DFIN's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.1% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.9% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.3% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TRMK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DFIN's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs DFIN's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.25 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.07 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.8% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.8 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 245K | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DFIN as "Buy" and TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for DFIN (target: $66) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). TRMK is the only dividend payer here at 2.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.7% | +3.0% |
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DFIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
DFIN vs TRMK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFIN or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (DFIN). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (DFIN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DFIN or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DFIN or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc.
(DFIN) delivered a total return of +65. 9%, compared to +47. 6% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus DFIN's +90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DFIN or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning DFIN is approximately 21% more volatile than TRMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (DFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DFIN or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -1. 9% for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (DFIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trustmark Corporation grew EPS 1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -62. 4% for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DFIN or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 4. 2% for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 19. 8% for DFIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DFIN or TRMK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc.
(DFIN) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFIN: 49. 2% to $66. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DFIN or TRMK?
In this comparison, TRMK (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DFIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DFIN or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94), 2. 2% yield, +127. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 7%, DFIN: +90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DFIN and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRMK pays a dividend while DFIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.