Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Publishing
DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Publishing |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $2.64B | $5.29B | $2.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $767M | $1.12B | $1.45B | $1.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $224M | $458M | $154M |
| Gross Margin | 63.4% | 71.0% | 65.6% | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.8% | 25.5% | 36.0% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 11.5x | 10.8x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $182M | $1.12B | $1.20B | $899M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $668M | $910M | $86M |
DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donnelley Financial… (DFIN) | 100 | 542.8 | +442.8% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| John Wiley & Sons, … (WLYB) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.0x)
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs DFIN's 90.3%
- PEG 1.42 vs HOMB's 3.55
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs WLYB's -10.4%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 0.16x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
- NIM 3.8% vs TRMK's 3.4%
WLYB is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 6.0% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 10.7% vs 7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs WLYB's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.7% margin vs DFIN's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs DFIN's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs WLYB's 3.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs DFIN's -15.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 10.7% vs 7.1% |
DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories
DFIN leads 1 • TRMK leads 1 • WLYB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLYB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.2x DFIN's $767M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DFIN's 4.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $767M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $217M | $323M | $601M | $402M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $224M | $458M | $154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $140M | $230M | $354M | $190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.4% | +71.0% | +65.6% | +72.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +20.0% | +27.7% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +20.7% | +29.1% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.0% | +5.4% | +26.0% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DFIN and TRMK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 68% valuation discount to DFIN's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.6B | $5.3B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $3.1B | $5.6B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.47x | 12.13x | 13.36x | 27.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.43x | 11.50x | 10.82x | 9.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 4.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 9.49x | 10.12x | 8.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 2.36x | 3.64x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | 1.28x | 1.36x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.25x | 11.39x | 12.53x | 19.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WLYB delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for DFIN. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WLYB's 1.20x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +10.8% | +10.9% | +20.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +1.2% | +2.0% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.9% | +7.1% | +7.2% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.6% | +3.2% | +9.8% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.53x | 0.30x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $157M | $448M | $292M | $813M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $668M | $910M | $86M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $182M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $899M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.86x | 0.75x | 1.44x | 5.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DFIN five years ago would be worth $16,588 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,995 for WLYB. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs DFIN's -15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs DFIN's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | +15.5% | -3.0% | +35.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | +32.5% | -1.9% | -1.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.1% | +118.5% | +42.0% | +25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.9% | +47.6% | +6.6% | -20.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.3% | +127.7% | +58.2% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +29.8% | +12.4% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and WLYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WLYB is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DFIN's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs DFIN's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.94x | 0.82x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.25 | $45.99 | $30.83 | $45.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.07 | $33.39 | $25.68 | $29.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.8% | +97.6% | +87.1% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.8 | 56.0 | 50.3 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 245K | 392K | 1.4M | 666 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and WLYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DFIN as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", WLYB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for DFIN (target: $66) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, WLYB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.32% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.00 | $45.50 | $32.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 | 19 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +2.8% | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 21 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 | $0.75 | $1.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.7% | +3.0% | +1.6% | +2.6% |
HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
DFIN vs TRMK vs HOMB vs WLYB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (DFIN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB?
Over the past 5 years, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc.
(DFIN) delivered a total return of +65. 9%, compared to -20. 1% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus WLYB's +10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(WLYB) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning DFIN is approximately -1443% more volatile than WLYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 120% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -10. 4% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. grew EPS 141. 9% year-over-year, compared to -62. 4% for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 4. 2% for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 13. 2% for WLYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLYB leads at 74. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (DFIN) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFIN: 49. 2% to $66. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB?
In this comparison, WLYB (3.
3% yield), HOMB (2. 8% yield), TRMK (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DFIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DFIN or TRMK or HOMB or WLYB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(WLYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLYB: +10. 2%, DFIN: +90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DFIN and TRMK and HOMB and WLYB?
These companies operate in different sectors (DFIN (Financial Services) and TRMK (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and WLYB (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WLYB is a small-cap income-oriented stock. TRMK, HOMB, WLYB pay a dividend while DFIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.