DFSC
DEFSEC Technologies Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DFSC vs BAH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Consulting Services
Market Cap$13.01B
5Y Perf.-9.5%
DFSC vs BAH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DFSC | BAH |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $13.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $11.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -183.7% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $4.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $885M |
DFSC vs BAH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DFSC
BAH
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEFSEC Technologies… (DFSC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Booz Allen Hamilton… (BAH) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFSC vs BAH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BAH leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. DEFSEC Technologies Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DFSC
DEFSEC Technologies Inc.
The Growth Play
DFSC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 228.6%, EPS growth 91.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 89.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 3.07x
- 228.6% revenue growth vs BAH's 12.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
The Income Pick
BAH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.7%
- 227.8% 10Y total return vs DFSC's -100.0%
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.79x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DFSC | 228.6% revenue growth vs BAH's 12.4% |
| Quality / Margins | BAH | 7.3% margin vs DFSC's -194.9% |
| Stability / Safety | BAH | Beta 0.35 vs DFSC's 1.75 |
| Dividends | BAH | 2.7% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DFSC | -27.5% vs BAH's -35.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BAH | 11.9% ROA vs DFSC's -74.6%, ROIC 24.3% vs -355.4% |
DFSC vs BAH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
DFSC vs BAH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBAHLAGGINGDFSC
DFSCDEFSEC Technologies I…
1leads
BAHBooz Allen Hamilton H…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs DFSCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BAH4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
DFSC3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BAH6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BAH4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BAH2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAH is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.4B annually — 2308.2x DFSC's $5M. BAH is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DFSC's -194.9%. On growth, DFSC holds the edge at +145.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DFSCDEFSEC Technologi… | BAHBooz Allen Hamilt… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $11.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $933M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -183.7% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -194.9% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -164.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.3% | -10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.4% |
BAH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
DFSC leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DFSCDEFSEC Technologi… | BAHBooz Allen Hamilt… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $16.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | 10.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 1.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | 9.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.28x |
DFSC leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAH delivers a 81.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $82 in annual profit, vs $-123 for DFSC. DFSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAH's 4.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAH scores 8/9 vs DFSC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | DFSCDEFSEC Technologi… | BAHBooz Allen Hamilt… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -123.5% | +81.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -74.6% | +11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | +24.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -143.6% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 4.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $885M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.19x | 5.67x |
BAH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BAH five years ago would be worth $10,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for DFSC. Over the past 12 months, DFSC leads with a -27.5% total return vs BAH's -35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAH at -3.1% vs DFSC's -81.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DFSCDEFSEC Technologi… | BAHBooz Allen Hamilt… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +105.7% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.5% | -35.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -9.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +2.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +227.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -81.5% | -3.1% |
BAH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAH is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DFSC's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAH currently trades 58.7% from its 52-week high vs DFSC's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DFSCDEFSEC Technologi… | BAHBooz Allen Hamilt… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.37 | $130.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $73.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.7% | +58.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.4 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 206K | 1.7M |
BAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BAH is the only dividend payer here at 2.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | DFSCDEFSEC Technologi… | BAHBooz Allen Hamilt… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $97.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
BAH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DFSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallBooz Allen Hamilton Holding… (BAH)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DFSC vs BAH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFSC or BAH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DEFSEC Technologies Inc.
(DFSC) is the stronger pick with 228. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DFSC or BAH?
Over the past 5 years, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) delivered a total return of +2.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAH returned +228. 5% versus DFSC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DFSC or BAH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus DEFSEC Technologies Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning DFSC is approximately 341% more volatile than BAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DFSC or BAH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DEFSEC Technologies Inc.
(DFSC) is pulling ahead at 228. 6% versus 12. 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DEFSEC Technologies Inc. grew EPS 91. 6% year-over-year, compared to 58. 0% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DFSC leads at 89. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DFSC or BAH?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
8% net margin versus -194. 8% for DEFSEC Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAH leads at 11. 4% versus -183. 7% for DFSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAH leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DFSC or BAH?
In this comparison, BAH (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. DFSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is DFSC or BAH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), 2. 7% yield, +228. 5% 10Y return). DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAH: +228. 5%, DFSC: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DFSC and BAH?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DFSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BAH is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BAH pays a dividend while DFSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DFSC: 145.3% · BAH: -10.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.