Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DFSC vs LDOS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DFSC
DEFSEC Technologies Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.51B
5Y Perf.+22.7%

DFSC vs LDOS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DFSC logoDFSC
LDOS logoLDOS
IndustryAerospace & DefenseInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$2M$16.51B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$17.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$1.36B
Gross Margin35.2%17.3%
Operating Margin-183.7%11.6%
Forward P/E11.0x
Total Debt$1M$5.93B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$1.20B

DFSC vs LDOSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DFSC
LDOS
StockJan 21May 26Return
DEFSEC Technologies… (DFSC)1000.0-100.0%
Leidos Holdings, In… (LDOS)100122.7+22.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DFSC vs LDOS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LDOS leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. DEFSEC Technologies Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DFSC
DEFSEC Technologies Inc.
The Growth Play

DFSC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 228.6%, EPS growth 91.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 89.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 3.07x
  • 228.6% revenue growth vs LDOS's 3.1%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

LDOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 1.2%
  • 223.8% 10Y total return vs DFSC's -100.0%
  • Beta 0.42, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.70x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDFSC logoDFSC228.6% revenue growth vs LDOS's 3.1%
Quality / MarginsLDOS logoLDOS7.8% margin vs DFSC's -194.9%
Stability / SafetyLDOS logoLDOSBeta 0.42 vs DFSC's 1.75
DividendsLDOS logoLDOS1.2% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LDOS logoLDOS-14.1% vs DFSC's -27.5%
Efficiency (ROA)LDOS logoLDOS9.4% ROA vs DFSC's -74.6%, ROIC 17.1% vs -355.4%

DFSC vs LDOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DFSCDEFSEC Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
National Security Solutions
57.7%$9.9B
Civil Segment
29.5%$5.1B
Defense Solution Segment
12.7%$2.2B

DFSC vs LDOS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLDOSLAGGINGDFSC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LDOS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

LDOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.5B annually — 3535.8x DFSC's $5M. LDOS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DFSC's -194.9%. On growth, DFSC holds the edge at +145.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDFSC logoDFSCDEFSEC Technologi…LDOS logoLDOSLeidos Holdings, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$17.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.2%+17.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-183.7%+11.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-194.9%+7.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-164.4%+9.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+145.3%+3.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.6%
LDOS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

DFSC leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricDFSC logoDFSCDEFSEC Technologi…LDOS logoLDOSLeidos Holdings, …
Market CapShares × price$2M$16.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$2M$21.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.34x11.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.67x0.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.42x3.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.16x
DFSC leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LDOS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LDOS delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-123 for DFSC. DFSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LDOS's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LDOS scores 8/9 vs DFSC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDFSC logoDFSCDEFSEC Technologi…LDOS logoLDOSLeidos Holdings, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-123.5%+27.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-74.6%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.6%+17.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-143.6%+21.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x1.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$4.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$5.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.19x9.91x
LDOS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LDOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LDOS five years ago would be worth $13,340 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for DFSC. Over the past 12 months, LDOS leads with a -14.1% total return vs DFSC's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LDOS at 19.8% vs DFSC's -81.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDFSC logoDFSCDEFSEC Technologi…LDOS logoLDOSLeidos Holdings, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+105.7%-28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.5%-14.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%+71.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+33.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+223.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-81.5%+19.8%
LDOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LDOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LDOS is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DFSC's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LDOS currently trades 63.8% from its 52-week high vs DFSC's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDFSC logoDFSCDEFSEC Technologi…LDOS logoLDOSLeidos Holdings, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.37$205.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.62$129.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+25.7%+63.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.424.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded206K1.0M
LDOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

LDOS is the only dividend payer here at 1.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricDFSC logoDFSCDEFSEC Technologi…LDOS logoLDOSLeidos Holdings, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$200.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts27
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.59
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.7%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

LDOS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DFSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallLeidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DFSC vs LDOS: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DFSC or LDOS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, DEFSEC Technologies Inc.

(DFSC) is the stronger pick with 228. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — DFSC or LDOS?

Over the past 5 years, Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) delivered a total return of +33. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LDOS returned +221. 6% versus DFSC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — DFSC or LDOS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus DEFSEC Technologies Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning DFSC is approximately 302% more volatile than LDOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 119% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — DFSC or LDOS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DEFSEC Technologies Inc.

(DFSC) is pulling ahead at 228. 6% versus 3. 1% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DEFSEC Technologies Inc. grew EPS 91. 6% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for Leidos Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DFSC leads at 89. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — DFSC or LDOS?

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -194. 8% for DEFSEC Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LDOS leads at 12. 3% versus -183. 7% for DFSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DFSC leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — DFSC or LDOS?

In this comparison, LDOS (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. DFSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is DFSC or LDOS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 2% yield, +221. 6% 10Y return). DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LDOS: +221. 6%, DFSC: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between DFSC and LDOS?

These companies operate in different sectors (DFSC (Industrials) and LDOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DFSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; LDOS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. LDOS pays a dividend while DFSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

DFSC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LDOS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DFSC and LDOS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DFSC: 145.3% · LDOS: 3.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.