Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DGNX vs CLSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
DGNX vs CLSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $40M | $3.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-261M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | -406.9% | -26.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $238K | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $43M |
DGNX vs CLSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diginex Limited (DGNX) | 100 | 37.4 | -62.6% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DGNX vs CLSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DGNX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.76
- Lower volatility, beta 2.76, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 3.79x
- Beta 2.76, current ratio 3.79x
CLSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs DGNX's 57.0%
- -33.2% margin vs DGNX's -255.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs DGNX's 57.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -33.2% margin vs DGNX's -255.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.76 vs CLSK's 3.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.6% vs DGNX's -80.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.5% ROA vs DGNX's -144.4% |
DGNX vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DGNX vs CLSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 384.8x DGNX's $2M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.2% (CLSK) to -2.6% (DGNX).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $181M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$261M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +41.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -133.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40M | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.58x | 12.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.54x | 4.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.27x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DGNX and CLSK each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLSK delivers a -13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-114 for DGNX. DGNX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLSK's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs DGNX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -114.4% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -144.4% | -8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -177.9% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $781M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237,675 | $824M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.71x | -18.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, CLSK leads with a +63.6% total return vs DGNX's -80.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -96.3% | +22.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.9% | +63.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +234.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -11.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -84.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +49.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DGNX and CLSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DGNX is the less volatile stock with a 2.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSK's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLSK currently trades 60.1% from its 52-week high vs DGNX's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.76x | 3.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $318.80 | $23.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $8.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.4% | +60.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 17.8 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 516K | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
CLSK leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
DGNX vs CLSK: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DGNX or CLSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 57. 0% for Diginex Limited (DGNX). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — DGNX or CLSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diginex Limited (DGNX) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
76β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning CLSK is approximately 24% more volatile than DGNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diginex Limited (DGNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 38% for CleanSpark, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — DGNX or CLSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 57. 0% for Diginex Limited (DGNX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -140. 9% for Diginex Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — DGNX or CLSK?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -255. 5% for Diginex Limited — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -406. 9% for DGNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DGNX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — DGNX or CLSK?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DGNX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is DGNX or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diginex Limited (DGNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between DGNX and CLSK?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.