DGNX vs CLSK vs COIN vs MARA

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 4% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 45. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) delivered a total return of -11. 8%, compared to -53. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COIN returned -38. 7% versus CLSK's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diginex Limited (DGNX) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

76β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning CLSK is approximately 24% more volatile than DGNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diginex Limited (DGNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 9. 4% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -255. 5% for Diginex Limited — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -406. 9% for DGNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DGNX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 36.

8% to $19. 42.

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. DGNX, COIN, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Diginex Limited (DGNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (DGNX (Technology) and CLSK (Technology) and COIN (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DGNX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.