Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $138M | $2.02B | $790M | $559.27B | $203.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125M | $1.74B | $1.33B | $64.08B | $36.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $104M | $35M | $16.21B | $7.04B |
| Gross Margin | 84.8% | 23.3% | 27.2% | 66.4% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 11.3% | 3.8% | 30.8% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 14.2x | 18.0x | 26.0x | 23.8x |
| Total Debt | $47M | $548M | $70M | $104.10B | $8.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $25M | $2M | $10.79B | $8.22B |
DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHI Group, Inc. (DHX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 361.8 | +261.8% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DHX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +134.6% vs SAP's -39.6%
HURN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 14.3% revenue growth vs DHX's -9.9%
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 26.0x)
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage
ORCL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs SAP's 151.1%
- 25.3% margin vs DHX's -1.8%
SAP is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 3.60 vs ORCL's 3.66
- 9.7% ROA vs DHX's -1.1%, ROIC 16.0% vs -5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs DHX's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 26.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs DHX's -1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.6% vs SAP's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs DHX's -1.1%, ROIC 16.0% vs -5.9% |
DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
DHX leads 1 • SAP leads 1 • HURN leads 0 • KFRC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 511.7x DHX's $125M. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DHX's -1.8%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125M | $1.7B | $1.3B | $64.1B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $231M | $56M | $26.5B | $11.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $104M | $35M | $16.2B | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $124M | $43M | -$24.7B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.8% | +23.3% | +27.2% | +66.4% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +11.3% | +3.8% | +30.8% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +6.0% | +2.6% | +25.3% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +7.1% | +3.3% | -38.6% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | +14.2% | +0.1% | +21.7% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +119.0% | +0.8% | +2.2% | +24.5% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
DHX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, HURN trades at a 52% valuation discount to ORCL's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SAP offers better value at 3.76x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138M | $2.0B | $790M | $559.3B | $203.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $181M | $2.5B | $858M | $652.6B | $203.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.63x | 21.37x | 22.05x | 44.82x | 24.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.02x | 14.18x | 17.96x | 25.99x | 23.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 6.31x | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 56.64x | 10.99x | 15.42x | 27.36x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 1.19x | 0.59x | 9.74x | 4.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 4.25x | 6.17x | 26.59x | 3.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.99x | 11.06x | 16.88x | — | 21.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-2 for DHX. SAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +21.8% | +27.2% | +56.3% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +6.8% | +9.2% | +8.1% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | +15.0% | +19.1% | +12.8% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.8% | +18.6% | +20.1% | +14.4% | +18.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 1.04x | 0.56x | 4.96x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $44M | $524M | $68M | $93.3B | -$149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $25M | $2M | $10.8B | $8.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47M | $548M | $70M | $104.1B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.04x | 7.70x | — | 5.44x | 8.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,325 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, DHX leads with a +134.6% total return vs SAP's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 27.3% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +95.7% | -27.1% | +39.2% | -0.1% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +134.6% | -17.2% | +18.9% | +31.6% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | +62.5% | -13.8% | +106.5% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.9% | +120.2% | -16.8% | +151.8% | +33.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.1% | +116.8% | +195.5% | +425.1% | +151.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.1% | +17.6% | -4.8% | +27.3% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DHX and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHX currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 55.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.82x | 0.53x | 1.59x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.34 | $186.78 | $47.48 | $345.72 | $313.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $112.45 | $24.49 | $134.57 | $160.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +66.8% | +91.0% | +56.3% | +55.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 37.4 | 65.6 | 68.5 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 251K | 243K | 305K | 26.3M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DHX as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", ORCL as "Buy", SAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 32.2% for ORCL (target: $257). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs ORCL's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $200.00 | $71.00 | $257.19 | $391.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 9 | 10 | 86 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.6% | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 8 | 18 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.55 | $1.65 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | +8.2% | +6.4% | +0.3% | +1.1% |
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DHX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DHX vs HURN vs KFRC vs ORCL vs SAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for DHI Group, Inc. (DHX). Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP?
On trailing P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the cheapest at 21. 4x versus Oracle Corporation at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SAP SE wins at 3. 60x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -16. 8% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +425. 1% versus DHX's -55. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 200% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SAP SE (SAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -9. 9% for DHI Group, Inc. (DHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -10. 6% for DHI Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -8. 9% for DHX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHX leads at 84. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SAP SE (SAP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 60x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Oracle Corporation — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 124. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), SAP (1. 5% yield), ORCL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DHX, HURN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DHX or HURN or KFRC or ORCL or SAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, DHX: -55. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DHX and HURN and KFRC and ORCL and SAP?
These companies operate in different sectors (DHX (Industrials) and HURN (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and ORCL (Technology) and SAP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DHX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SAP is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC, ORCL, SAP pay a dividend while DHX, HURN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.