DK vs PARR

For growth investors, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the stronger pick with -6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) delivered a total return of +319. 5%, compared to +98. 1% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PARR returned +261. 5% versus DK's +253. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Delek US Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning DK is approximately -3773% more volatile than PARR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 6% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is pulling ahead at -6. 4% versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1314% year-over-year, compared to 95. 7% for Delek US Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PARR leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 9% net margin versus -0. 2% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PARR leads at 7. 2% versus 3. 7% for DK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PARR leads at 18. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PARR: -1. 1% to $61. 60.

In this comparison, DK (2.

3% yield) pays a dividend. PARR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Delek US Holdings, Inc.

(DK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 2. 3% yield, +253. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DK: +253. 9%, PARR: +261. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PARR is a small-cap deep-value stock. DK pays a dividend while PARR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.