Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.71B | $15.58B | $81.56B | $57.12B | $68.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $44.26B | $52.60B | $12.54B | $89.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $170M | $1.44B | $5.80B | $4.71B | $5.55B |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 3.3% | 13.6% | 60.0% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 3.2% | 13.5% | 44.9% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 13.8x | 13.1x | 12.7x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $7.93B | $34.93B | $26.16B | $71.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $348M | $1.25B | $2.14B | $1.27B |
DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.3 | +114.3% |
| Plains All American… (PAA) | 100 | 227.7 | +127.7% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
| Energy Transfer LP (ET) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DKL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 8.7%
- 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7%
- +45.1% vs MPLX's +22.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PAA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EPD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs DKL's 0.35, lower leverage
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 184.4% 10Y total return vs DKL's 207.3%
- Beta 0.18, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.23x
- 8.4% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
ET is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 12.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs PAA's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs DKL's 0.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs MPLX's +22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs ET's 4.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 6.3% |
DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAA leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPLX leads 1 • DKL leads 1 • EPD leads 0 • ET leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ET is the larger business by revenue, generating $89.4B annually — 84.2x DKL's $1.1B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAA's 3.2%. On growth, ET holds the edge at +32.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $44.3B | $52.6B | $12.5B | $89.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $310M | $2.4B | $9.7B | $7.0B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $170M | $1.4B | $5.8B | $4.7B | $5.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $112M | $2.4B | $3.0B | $5.0B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +3.3% | +13.6% | +60.0% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +3.2% | +13.5% | +44.9% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +3.2% | +11.0% | +37.5% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +5.5% | +5.6% | +39.8% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.0% | -19.1% | -2.9% | +5.2% | +32.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | +14.0% | +2.7% | -17.3% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PAA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 61% valuation discount to PAA's 30.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DKL's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 13.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $15.6B | $81.6B | $57.1B | $68.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $23.2B | $115.2B | $81.1B | $138.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.46x | 30.26x | 14.18x | 11.67x | 14.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.82x | 13.77x | 13.14x | 12.71x | 12.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.54x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.81x | 10.51x | 12.10x | 13.27x | 9.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.68x | 0.31x | 1.55x | 4.83x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 446.88x | 1.18x | 2.70x | 3.95x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.33x | 27.51x | 13.93x | 17.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for PAA. PAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPD scores 6/9 vs PAA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | +6.3% | +19.3% | +32.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +4.8% | +7.5% | +11.3% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +4.2% | +8.3% | +9.9% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +5.4% | +10.9% | +12.9% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.75x | 0.61x | 1.14x | 1.80x | 1.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $7.6B | $33.7B | $24.0B | $70.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $348M | $1.2B | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $7.9B | $34.9B | $26.2B | $71.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.66x | 7.00x | 5.21x | 5.85x | 2.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAA five years ago would be worth $29,517 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,598 for DKL. Over the past 12 months, DKL leads with a +45.1% total return vs MPLX's +22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAA at 27.5% vs DKL's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | +25.9% | +20.7% | +6.4% | +22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.1% | +41.8% | +31.7% | +22.5% | +25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | +107.0% | +73.8% | +95.7% | +90.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.0% | +195.2% | +105.7% | +157.2% | +158.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.3% | +54.1% | +119.8% | +184.4% | +142.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +27.5% | +20.2% | +25.1% | +23.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPD and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DKL's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ET currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs DKL's 91.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.11x | 0.06x | 0.18x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.89 | $23.04 | $39.73 | $59.98 | $20.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.50 | $15.69 | $29.90 | $47.80 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +95.9% | +95.0% | +93.8% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 53.4 | 47.0 | 46.5 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 3.4M | 4.1M | 1.8M | 14.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DKL and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DKL as "Hold", PAA as "Buy", EPD as "Buy", MPLX as "Buy", ET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -4.6% for ET (target: $19). For income investors, DKL offers the higher dividend yield at 8.72% vs EPD's 5.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.00 | $22.60 | $37.00 | $60.25 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 42 | 45 | 28 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.7% | +5.7% | +5.7% | +7.0% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.45 | $1.27 | $2.14 | $3.94 | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
PAA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MPLX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
DKL vs PAA vs EPD vs MPLX vs ET: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the stronger pick with 8.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. (PAA) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. at 30. 3x. On forward P/E, Energy Transfer LP is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET?
Over the past 5 years, Plains All American Pipeline, L.
P. (PAA) delivered a total return of +195. 2%, compared to +86. 0% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKL returned +207. 3% versus PAA's +54. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Delek Logistics Partners, LP's 0. 35β — meaning DKL is approximately 454% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. (PAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MPLX Lp (MPLX) is pulling ahead at 8.
4% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MPLX Lp grew EPS 14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 9% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAA leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 1. 5% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus 2. 4% for PAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Energy Transfer LP (ET) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 8% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) offers the highest yield at 8. 7%, versus 5. 7% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD).
09Is DKL or PAA or EPD or MPLX or ET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 5. 7% yield, +119. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +119. 8%, DKL: +207. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DKL and PAA and EPD and MPLX and ET?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.