Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $5.49B | $4.25B | $8.64B | $10.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $876M | $4.62B | $262M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $241M | $106M | $-185M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 87.9% | 62.5% | 48.8% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 25.8% | -1.0% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 36.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $39M | $1.76B | $7.52B | $542M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $702M | $97M | $1.61B | $391M |
DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dolby Laboratories,… (DLB) | 100 | 94.6 | -5.4% |
| Iridium Communicati… (IRDM) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1826.9 | +1726.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 3.17x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.3%, current ratio 3.17x
- Better valuation composite
IRDM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VSAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +6.1% vs DLB's -19.9%
GSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 201.8% 10Y total return vs IRDM's 412.1%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs IRDM's 4.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs IRDM's 4.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs GSAT's -19.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IRDM's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs DLB's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs VSAT's -3.6%, ROIC 10.1% vs -0.7% |
DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
VSAT leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • IRDM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DLB and VSAT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 17.6x GSAT's $262M. DLB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -19.0%. On growth, VSAT holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $876M | $4.6B | $262M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $352M | $439M | $1.3B | $93M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $241M | $106M | -$185M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $380M | $305M | $907M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.9% | +62.5% | +48.8% | +57.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +25.8% | -1.0% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +12.1% | -4.0% | -19.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +34.8% | +19.6% | +57.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +1.9% | +3.0% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | -25.9% | +173.2% | -121.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VSAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, DLB trades at a 42% valuation discount to IRDM's 37.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VSAT's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $4.2B | $8.6B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $5.9B | $14.5B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.93x | 37.92x | -14.81x | -138.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.27x | 36.13x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.09x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.27x | 13.25x | 11.51x | 119.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.07x | 4.87x | 1.91x | 41.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 9.37x | 1.86x | 28.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.76x | 14.17x | — | 57.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DLB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRDM delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-14 for GSAT. DLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRDM's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRDM scores 8/9 vs GSAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +22.8% | -4.0% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +4.1% | -3.6% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +8.0% | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +9.6% | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 3.81x | 1.62x | 1.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$663M | $1.7B | $5.9B | $151M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $702M | $97M | $1.6B | $391M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $1.8B | $7.5B | $542M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 65.71x | 2.67x | 6.37x | -0.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,540 for DLB. Over the past 12 months, VSAT leads with a +614.8% total return vs DLB's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs IRDM's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +127.1% | +76.3% | +27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +55.0% | +614.8% | +305.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -33.9% | +80.1% | +484.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | +10.7% | +33.8% | +393.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +412.1% | -12.1% | +201.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | -12.9% | +21.7% | +80.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DLB and GSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DLB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSAT's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs DLB's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.05x | 2.92x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.28 | $44.36 | $68.92 | $82.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.73 | $15.65 | $8.61 | $17.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +90.6% | +96.2% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 63.3 | 67.3 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 610K | 2.3M | 1.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
DLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLB as "Buy", IRDM as "Buy", VSAT as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.0% upside for DLB (target: $85) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, DLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.00 | $35.50 | $57.67 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 | 20 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.5% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $0.58 | — | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +4.4% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
DLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). VSAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DLB vs IRDM vs VSAT vs GSAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT?
On trailing P/E, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
(DLB) is the cheapest at 21. 9x versus Iridium Communications Inc. at 37. 9x. On forward P/E, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -34. 6% for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRDM returned +412. 1% versus VSAT's -12. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
(DLB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Viasat, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning VSAT is approximately 255% more volatile than DLB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Iridium Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus 4. 9% for Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viasat, Inc. grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSAT leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT?
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
(DLB) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 9% net margin versus -25. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRDM leads at 27. 1% versus -2. 2% for VSAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DLB leads at 88. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
(DLB) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 36. 1x for Iridium Communications Inc. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DLB: 48. 0% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT?
In this comparison, DLB (2.
3% yield), IRDM (1. 5% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. VSAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DLB or IRDM or VSAT or GSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 1. 5% yield, +412. 1% 10Y return). Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRDM: +412. 1%, VSAT: -12. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLB and IRDM and VSAT and GSAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (DLB (Technology) and IRDM (Communication Services) and VSAT (Technology) and GSAT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
DLB, IRDM pay a dividend while VSAT, GSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.